Abstract
Reasoning about norms and time is of central concern to the regulation or control of the behavior of a multiagent system. In this paper we introduce a representation of normative systems that distinguishes between norms and the detached obligations of agents over time, leading to a simple and therefore practical way to reason about norms, obligations, time and agents. We consider the reasoning tasks to determine whether a norm is redundant in a normative system and whether two normative systems are equivalent. In the former case the redundant norm might be removed. In the latter case one norm might be replaced by the other. It is well known that properties concerning iterated or deontic detachment no longer hold when reasoning with multiple agents or with obligations over time. Yet, earlier approaches to reasoning about norms rarely consider the intricacies of time. We show how norms can be used to define the persistence of obligations of agents over time. We illustrate our approach by discussing three ways to relate norms and obligations of agents over time. Also we show how these three ways can be characterized.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alchourrón, C.E., Makinson, D.: Hierarchies of regulations and their logic. In: Hilpinen, R. (ed.) New Studies in Deontic Logic, pp. 125–148. Reidel (1981)
Alchourrón, C.E., Bulygin, E.: Normative Systems. Springer, Wien (1971)
Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A., Mang, F.Y.C., Qadeer, S., Rajamani, S.K., Tasiran, S.: Mocha: Modularity in model checking. In: Y. Vardi, M. (ed.) CAV 1998. LNCS, vol. 1427, pp. 521–525. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Artikis, A., Sergot, M., Pitt, J.: Specifying electronic societies with the causal calculator. In: Giunchiglia, F., Odell, J.J., Weiss, G. (eds.) AOSE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2585, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: An architecture of a normative system. In: Procs. of AAMAS 2006, pp. 229–231. ACM Press, New York (2006)
Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Substantive and procedural norms in normative multiagent systems. Journal of Applied Logic (2008)
Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H. (eds.): Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory. Selected papers from NORMAS 2005 (2006)
Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H. (eds.): Normative Mulit-agent systems, Procs. of NORMAS 2007, Dagstuhl Seminar proceedings 07122 (2007)
Broersen, J., Brunel, J.: What I fail to do today, I have to do tomorrow: a logical study of the propagation of obligations. In: Proceedings CLIMA VIII. LNCS. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Broersen, J., Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Meyer, J.-J.: Designing a deontic logic of deadlines. In: Lomuscio, A., Nute, D. (eds.) DEON 2004. LNCS, vol. 3065, pp. 43–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Brunel, J., Bodeveix, J.-P., Filali, M.: A state/Event temporal deontic logic. In: Goble, L., Meyer, J.-J.C. (eds.) DEON 2006. LNCS, vol. 4048, pp. 53–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Chisholm, R.: Contrary-to-duty imperatives and deontic logic. Analyse 24, 33–36 (1963)
Forrester, J.: Gentle murder, or the adverbial samaritan. The Journal of Philosophy 81, 193–197 (1984)
Hansen, J., Pigozzi, G., van der Torre, L.: Ten philosophical problems in deontic logic. In: Proceedings of Normative Multi-agent Systems, NORMAS 2007 (2007)
Hansen, J.: Sets, sentences, and some logics about imperatives. Fundam. Inform. 48(2-3), 205–226 (2001)
Horty, J.: Agency and Deontic Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)
Jones, A., Sergot, M.: A formal characterisation of institutionalised power. Logic Journal of IGPL (1996)
Loewer, Belzer: Dyadic deontic detachment. Synthese 54, 295–318 (1983)
Makinson, D.: Five faces of minimality. Studia Logica 52, 339–379 (1993)
Makinson, D.: On a fundamental problem of deontic logic. In: McNamara, P., Prakken, H. (eds.) Norms, Logics and Information Systems. New Studies on Deontic Logic and Computer Science, pp. 29–54. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)
Makinson, D., van der Torre, L.: Input-output logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29(4), 383–408 (2000)
Makinson, D., van der Torre, L.: Constraints for input-output logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30(2), 155–185 (2001)
Makinson, D., van der Torre, L.: Permissions from an input-output perspective. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32(4), 391–416 (2003)
Meyer, J.J.C.: A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29(1), 109–136 (1988)
Pacuit, E., Parikh, R., Cogan, E.: The logic of knowledge based obligation. Knowledge, Rationality and Action 149(2), 311–341 (2006)
Sergot, M.J., Craven, R.: The deontic component of action language nC+. In: Goble, L., Meyer, J.-J.C. (eds.) DEON 2006. LNCS, vol. 4048, pp. 222–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
van Eck, J.: A system of temporally relative modal and deontic predicate logic and its philosophical applications. logique et analyse 25, 339–381 (1982)
van Fraassen, B.: Values and the heart’s command. The Journal of Philosophy (1973)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Broersen, J., van der Torre, L. (2009). Reasoning about Norms, Obligations, Time and Agents. In: Ghose, A., Governatori, G., Sadananda, R. (eds) Agent Computing and Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5044. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01639-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01639-4_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01638-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01639-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)