Skip to main content

Incremental Process Modeling through Stakeholder-Based Hybrid Process Simulation

  • Conference paper
Trustworthy Software Development Processes (ICSP 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5543))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 997 Accesses

Abstract

Both the process modeling and process simulation are necessary components of process automation. A Process Modeling Language (PML) is a set of description tools that define processes attributes and constrains in a specific domain. Process modeling stakeholders may have different levels of dependencies on different types of PMLs. They also have various perspectives for modeling a process. Discrete and continuous PMLs are complimentary in modeling the process at different levels of abstraction and to address different stakeholders’ perspectives. The hybrid process simulation combines micro-level discrete process models with the macro-level continuous process models to capture process dynamics and deploy process optimization. This paper proposes an incremental approach based on the hybrid simulation in modeling a software process at different levels of abstraction in order to address different stakeholders’ perspectives. By addressing stakeholders’ concerns in hybrid simulation at each process segment, this approach incrementally integrates internal process dynamics and modifications due to external changes into process model that cannot be easily achieved by individually using discrete or continuous modeling approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pall, G.A.: Quality Process Management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cass, A.G., Lerner, B.S., Sutton Jr., S.M., McCall, E.K., Wise, A., Osterweil, L.J.: Little-jil/juliette: a process definition language and interpreter. In: ICSE 2000: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Software Engineering, pp. 754–757. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Osterweil, L.J.: Jil and little-jil process programming languages. In: Gruhn, V. (ed.) EWSPT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1487, p. 152. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, L., Boehm, B., Hu, H., Ge, J., Lü, J., Qian, C.: Applying the value/petri process to erp software development in china. In: ICSE 2006: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, pp. 502–511. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Madachy, R.J., Boehm, B.W.: Software Process Modeling With System Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bai, X., Huang, L.: A stakeholder perspective in evaluating process modeling languages and hybrid process simulation. Technical Report (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baldi, M., Gai, S., Jaccheri, M.L., Lago, P.: E3: object-oriented software process model design, pp. 279–292 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jäger, D., Schleicher, A., Westfechtel, B.: Using uml for software process modeling. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 24(6), 91–108 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gruhn, V.: Managing software processes in the environment melmac. In: SDE 4: Proceedings of the fourth ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Software development environments, pp. 193–205. ACM Press, New York (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Bandinelli, S., Fuggetta, A., Ghezzi, C., Lavazza, L.: Spade: an environment for software process analysis, design, and enactment, pp. 223–247 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sutton Jr., S.M., Osterweil, L.J.: The design of a next-generation process language. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 22(6), 142–158 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zamli, K.Z.: Process modeling languages: A literature review. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science 14(2), 26–37 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. An, L., Jeng, J.J.: On developing system dynamics model for business process simulation. In: WSC 2005: Proceedings of the 37th conference on Winter simulation, Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 2068–2077 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Raffo, D.M., Kellner, M.I.: Predicting the impact of potential process changes: A quantitative approach to process modeling. Elements of Software Process Assessment and Improvement (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wakeland, W.W., Martin, R.H., Raffo, D.: Using design of experiments, sensitivity analysis, and hybrid simulation to evaluate changes to a software development process: a case study. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 9(2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abdel-Hamid, T., Madnick, S.E.: Software project dynamics: an integrated approach. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lehman, M., Ramil, J.F.: The impact of feedback in the global software process. Journal of Systems and Software 46, 123–134 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Powell, A., Mander, K., Brown, D.: Strategies for lifecycle concurrency and iteration - a system dynamics approach. Journal of Systems and Software 46(2-3), 151–161 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tvedt, J.D.: An extensible model for evaluating the impact of process improvements on software development cycle time. PhD thesis, Tempe, AZ, USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, H., Jeffery, R., Zhu, L.: Investigating test-and-fix processes of incremental development using hybrid process simulation. In: WoSQ 2008: Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on Software quality, pp. 23–28. ACM Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martin, R.H., Raffo, D.: A model of the software development process using both continuous and discrete models. In: Software Process: Improvement and Practice, vol. 5(2-3), pp. 147–157. John Wiley Sons, Chichester (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Madachy, R.J.: Software Process Dynamics. Wiley, IEEE Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kellner, M.I., Feiler, P.H., Finkelstein, A., Katayama, T., Osterweil, L.J., Penedo, M.H., Rombach, H.D.: Ispw-6 software process example. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Software Process, 1991, pp. 176–186 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bai, X., Huang, L., Koolmanojwong, S. (2009). Incremental Process Modeling through Stakeholder-Based Hybrid Process Simulation. In: Wang, Q., Garousi, V., Madachy, R., Pfahl, D. (eds) Trustworthy Software Development Processes. ICSP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5543. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01680-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01680-6_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01679-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01680-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics