Skip to main content

Finding the Most Interesting Association Rules by Aggregating Objective Interestingness Measures

  • Conference paper
Book cover Knowledge Acquisition: Approaches, Algorithms and Applications (PKAW 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5465))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Association rule post-processing is a research challenge in KDD. In this post-processing task, objective interestingness measures are very useful for finding interesting rules possessing certain characteristics. Till now, the usual method for using objective interestingness measures is to select one or several suitable measures for filtering rules. This paper proposes a new approach to aggregate a set of interestingness measures using the Choquet integral as an advanced aggregation operator. Since an objective interestingness measure is considered as a point of view on rule quality, the aggregation of a set of objective interestingness measures can extract rules satisfying many points of view. The experiment is carried out on different groups (i.e. different natures) of objective interestingness measures to observe their behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., Swami, A.: Mining association rules between sets of items in large database. In: Proceedings of 1993 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 207–216 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal, R., Srikant, R.: Fast algorithm for mining association rules. In: Proceedings of the 20th Very Large Databases conference, pp. 487–499 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klemettinen, M., Mannila, H., Ronkainen, P., Toivonen, H., Verkamo, A.I.: Finding interesting rules from large sets of discovered association rules. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 1994), pp. 401–407 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tan, P., Kumar, V., Srivastava, J.: Selecting the right interestingness measure for association patterns. Information Systems 4(29), 293–313 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guillet, F.: Mesures de la qualité des connaissances en ECD. In: EGC 2004 Actes des Tutoriels, 4e Conférence Francophone en Extraction et Gestion des Connaissances, pp. 1–60 (2004) (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huynh, H.X., Guillet, F., Blanchard, J., Kuntz, P., Gras, R., Briand, H.: A graph-based clustering approach to evaluate interestingness measures: a tool and a comparative study. In: Quality Measures in Data Mining. Studies in Computational Intelligence, pp. 25–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Blanchard, J., Guillet, F., Gras, R., Briand, H.: Using information-theoretic measures to assess association rules interestingness. In: ICDM 2005, Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 191–200 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blanchard, J., Guillet, F., Gras, R., Briand, H.: Assessing rule interestingness with a probabilistic measure of deviation from equilibrium. In: ASMDA 2005, Proceeding of the 11th International Symposium on Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, pp. 191–200 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Geng, L., Hamilton, H.J.: Interestingness measures for data mining: A survey. ACM Computing Survey 38(3), 1–32 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Choquet, G.: Theory of capacities. Annales de l’Institut Fourier 5, 131–295 (1953)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Silberchatz, A., Tuzhilin, A.: What makes pattern interesting in knowledge discovery systems. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 5, 970–974 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugeno, M.: Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications. Ph.D thesis, Tokyo Institute of Technology (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shapley, L.: A value for n-person games. In: Kuhn, H., Tucker, A. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games. Annals of mathematics studies edn., vol. 2, pp. 307–317. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murofushi, T., Soneda, S.: Techniques for reading fuzzy measures (iii): interaction index. In: The 9th Fuzzy System Symposium, pp. 693–696 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grabisch, M., Kojadinovic, I., Meyer, P.: A review of capacity identification methods for Choquet integral based multiattribute utility theory: Applications of the KAPPALAB R Package. European Journal of Operational Research 186(2), 766–785 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Asuncion, A., Newman, D.: UCI machine learing repository. University of California, Irvine, School of Information and Computer Sciences (2007), http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nguyen Le, T.T., Huynh, H.X., Guillet, F. (2009). Finding the Most Interesting Association Rules by Aggregating Objective Interestingness Measures. In: Richards, D., Kang, BH. (eds) Knowledge Acquisition: Approaches, Algorithms and Applications. PKAW 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5465. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01715-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01715-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01714-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01715-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics