Skip to main content

Business Value of Solution Architecture

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 28))

Abstract

The theory and especially the practice of IT architecture have been developed quite vigorously the last years. However, hardly any quantitative data about the value of IT architecture is available. This paper presents the results of a study, which measures the value of IT solution architecture for software development projects. The study identifies ten architecture-related project-variables and correlates these with eight project success variables. Statistical analysis of 49 IT projects shows that the use of solution architecture is correlated with decreased budget and time overrun, increased reliability of project planning and increased customer satisfaction. The results of the study indicate that IT usage of solution architecture for custom software development projects leads to better project results. Also the limitations of the study are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. TOGAF: The Open Group Architecture Framework, Version 8.1 Enterprise Edition. TOGAF (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lankhorst, et al.: Marc: Enterprise Architecture at Work, Modeling, Communication and Analysis. Telematica Instituut, Enschede (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rijsenbrij, D., Goedvolk, H.: Integrated Architecture Framework. White Paper (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parker, M., Trainor, E., Benson, R.: Information Strategy and Economics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oirsouw, R., Spanderman, J., Vries, H.: Informatie Economie, Investeringsstrategie voor de Informatievoorziening (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kerzner, H.: Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley, Chichester (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Office of Government Commerce: PRINCE2. Office of Government Commerce (accessed 2008), http://www.ogc.gov.uk/methods_prince_2.asp

  8. Barnes, J.: Implementing the IBM Rational Unified Process and Solutions: A Guide to Improving Your Software Development Capability and Maturity. IBM Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. DSDM: Enabling Business Agility. In: DSDM Consortium, http://www.dsdm.org/10 (accessed, August 2008)

  10. SEI: CMMI for Development Version 1.2. Carnegie Mellon University - Software Engineering Institute (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. DSDM and TOGAF: DSDM and TOGAF Joint White Paper (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ambler, S.: Enterprise Unified Process (EUP) (accessed, January 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Piselo, T., Strassman, P.: IT Value Chain Management - Maximising the ROI from IT investments. Standish Report (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wagter, R., Berg, M., Luijpers, J., Steenbergen, M.: Dynamic Enterprise Architecture: How to Make It Work. Wiley, Chichester (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wohlin, C., Andrews, A.: Prioritizing and Assessing Software Project Success Factors and Project Characteristics using Subjective Data. Empirical Software Engineering: An International Journal 8(3), 285–308 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jurgens, R.: The Added Value of Enterprise Architecture, M Sc Thesis., University Delft (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wideman, M.: Improving PM: Linking Success Criteria to Project Type, www.maxwideman.com (accessed July 02, 2008), http://www.maxwideman.com/papers/improvingpm/dimensions.htm

  18. Pyzdek, T.: The Six Sigma Handbook, Revised and Expanded. McGraw-Hill, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Standish Group International: CHAOS: A recipe for success (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Standish Group International: Extreme Chaos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. McGroddy, J., Lin, H. (eds.): A Review of the FBI’s Trilogy Information Technology Modernization Program, Washington DC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. IEEE: The IEEE 1471-2000 standard - Architecture Views and Viewpoints (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maes, R., Rijsenbrij, D., Truijens, O.: Reconsidering Information Management Through a Generic Framework, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Martin, J., Leben, J.: Strategic Information Planning Methodologies. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Capgemini: Architecture and the Integrated Architecture Framework, http://www.capgemini.com (accessed, December 2007), http://www.capgemini.cm/resources/thought_leadership/architecture_and_the_integrated_architedcture_framework

  27. Kruskal, W., Wallis, W.: Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the Americal Statistical Society(45) (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Levene, H.: In Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford University Press (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lindman, H.: Analysis of variance in complex experimental designs. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zachman, J.: A Framework for Information Architecture. IBM Systems Journal (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Montgomery, D.: Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Moore, M., Kazman, R., Klein, M., Asundi, J.: Quantifying the Value of Architecture Design Decisions: Lessons from the Field. Software Engineering (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Slot, R., Dedene, G., Maes, R. (2009). Business Value of Solution Architecture. In: Proper, E., Harmsen, F., Dietz, J.L.G. (eds) Advances in Enterprise Engineering II. PRET 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 28. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01859-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01859-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01858-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01859-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics