Skip to main content

Observational Effort and Formally Open Mappings

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language, Information and Computation (WoLLIC 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5514))

  • 548 Accesses

Abstract

Starting off with Moss and Parikh’s investigation into knowledge and topology, we propose a logical system which is capable of formally handling endomorphisms of subset spaces. The motivation for doing so originates from dynamic agent logics. Usually, these logics comprise certain epistemic actions. Our aim is to show that an appropriate extension of the Moss-Parikh system can serve similar purposes. In fact, since the semantics of an action can be described as a function inducing a change of the knowledge states of the involved agents, such transformations are to be modeled accordingly. Due to the ambivalence of the framework used here, this has some quasi-topological impact, too, in so far as a certain notion of open mapping can be captured now. The main issues of this paper concern the basic logical properties of the arising system, in particular, completeness. Our main technical resource for that is hybrid logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. McKinsey, J.C.C.: A solution to the decision problem for the Lewis systems S2 and S4, with an application to topology. Journal of Symbolic Logic 6, 117–141 (1941)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. McKinsey, J.C.C., Tarski, A.: The algebra of topology. Annals of Mathematics 45, 141–191 (1944)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Aiello, M., Pratt-Hartmann, I.E., van Benthem, J.F.A.K.: Handbook of Spatial Logics. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dabrowski, A., Moss, L.S., Parikh, R.: Topological reasoning and the logic of knowledge. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 78, 73–110 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Moss, L.S., Parikh, R., Steinsvold, C.: Handbook of Spatial Logics [3], pp. 299–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heinemann, B.: Reasoning about knowledge and continuity. In: Goebel, R., Sutcliffe, G. (eds.) Proceedings 19th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS 2006), pp. 37–42. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heinemann, B.: Reasoning about operations on sets. In: Kobti, Z., Wu, D. (eds.) Canadian AI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4509, pp. 308–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Synthese Library, vol. 337. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 53. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Heinemann, B.: A hybrid logic for reasoning about knowledge and topology. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17(1), 19–41 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Areces, C., ten Cate, B.: Handbook of Modal Logic [12], pp. 821–868. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blackburn, P., van Benthem, J., Wolter, F.: Handbook of Modal Logic. Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning, vol. 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Heinemann, B.: Topological nexttime logic. In: Kracht, M., de Rijke, M., Wansing, H., Zakharyaschev, M. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic 1, Stanford, CA. CSLI Publications, vol. 87, pp. 99–113. CSLI Publications, Kluwer (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, Y.N.: A two-dimensional hybrid logic of subset spaces. In: Ramanujam, R., Sarukkai, S. (eds.) Logic and Its Applications, ICLA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5378, pp. 196–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Heinemann, B. (2009). Observational Effort and Formally Open Mappings. In: Ono, H., Kanazawa, M., de Queiroz, R. (eds) Logic, Language, Information and Computation. WoLLIC 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5514. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02261-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02261-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02260-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02261-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics