Skip to main content

Rough Ensemble Classifier: A Comparative Study

  • Conference paper
Fuzzy Logic and Applications (WILF 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5571))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Combining the results of a number of individually trained classification systems to obtain a more accurate classifier is a widely used technique in pattern recognition. In this article, we have introduced a rough set based meta classifier (RSM). Theoretical analysis of the proposed RSM is carried out in relation to Bayes classifier since Bayes classifier is the best classifier. It has been shown that the performance of the meta classifier is at least as good as the best constituent classifier, and if one of the base classifiers of RSM converges to Bayes then RSM converges to Bayes classifier. Experimental studies show that the meta classifier improves accuracy of classification and beats other ensemble approaches in accuracy by a decisive margin, thus demonstrating the theoretical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dietterich, T.G.: Machine-learning research: Four current directions. The AI Magazine 18(4), 97–136 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, G., Liu, Q., Yao, Y., Skowron, A. (eds.): RSFDGrC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2639, pp. 41–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saha, S., Murthy, C.A., Pal, S.K.: Rough set based ensemble classifier for web page classification. Fundamentae Informetica 76(1-2), 171–187 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fukunaga, K.: Introduction to statistical pattern recognition, 2nd edn. Academic Press Professional, Inc., San Diego (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ross Quinlan, J.: C4.5: Programs for machine learning, p. 302. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, P., Boswell, R.: Rule induction with CN2: Some recent improvements. In: Proc. Fifth European Working Session on Learning, pp. 151–163 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wettschereck, D., Dietterich, T.G.: An experimental comparison of the nearest-neighbor and nearest-hyperrectangle algorithms. Machine Learning 19(1), 5–27 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Machine Learning 20(3), 273–297 (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gama, J.: Iterative bayes. Theoretical Computer Science 292, 417–430 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolpert, D.H.: Stacked generalization. Neural Networks 5, 241–259 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Merz, C.J.: Using Correspondence Analysis to Combine Classiers. Machine Learning 36(1/2), 33–58 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zenko, B., Todorovski, L., Dzeroski, S.: A comparison of stacking with meta decision trees to bagging, boosting, and stacking with other methods. In: ICDM 2001: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 669–670. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Melville, P., Mooney, R.: Constructing diverse classifier ensembles using artificial training examples. In: Proc. of 18th Intl. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 505–510 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 148–156 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors. Machine Learning 24, 123–140 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuncheva, L.I., Whitaker, C.J.: Measures of diversity in classifier ensembles. Machine Learning 51, 181–207 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Best, D.J., Rayner, J.C.W.: Welch’s approximate solution for the Behrens-Fisher problem. Technometrics 29(2), 205–210 (1987)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saha, S., Murthy, C.A., Pal, S.K. (2009). Rough Ensemble Classifier: A Comparative Study. In: Di Gesù, V., Pal, S.K., Petrosino, A. (eds) Fuzzy Logic and Applications. WILF 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5571. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02282-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02282-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02281-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02282-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics