Skip to main content

Robust Correctness Testing for Digital Forensic Tools

  • Conference paper
Forensics in Telecommunications, Information and Multimedia (e-Forensics 2009)

Abstract

In previous work, the authors presented a theoretical lower bound on the required number of testing runs for performance testing of digital forensic tools. We also demonstrated a practical method of testing showing how to tolerate both measurement and random errors in order to achieve results close to this bound. In this paper, we extend the previous work to the situation of correctness testing.

The contribution of this methodology enables the tester to achieve correctness testing results of high quality from a manageable number of observations and in a dynamic but controllable way. This is of particular interest to forensic testers who do not have access to sophisticated equipment and who can allocate only a small amount of time to testing.

The original version of this chapter was revised: The copyright line was incorrect. This has been corrected. The Erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02312-5_25

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beckett, J., Slay, J.: Digital Forensics: Validation and Verification in a Dynamic Work Environment. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2007), p. 266a (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. CFTT group from NIST. Disk Imaging Specifications. NIST technial report (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. CFTT group from NIST. Digital Data Acquisition Tool Specification. NIST technial report (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. CFTT group from NIST. Digital Data Acquisition Tool Test Assertions and Test Plan. NIST technial report (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Digital Forensics Research Workshop. DFRWS06 Forensic Challenge, http://www.dfrws.org/2006/challenge/index.shtml

  6. Brian Carrier. Digital Forensics Tool Testing Images, http://dftt.sourceforge.net/

  7. Hedayat, A.S., Sloane, N.J.A., Stufken, J.: Orthogonal Arrays: Theory and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. NIST/SEMATECH. e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/

  9. Mohay, G.: Technical Challenges and Directions for Digital Forensics. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering (SADFE 2005), pp. 155–161 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pan, L., Batten, L.M.: A Lower Bound on Effective Performance Testing for Digital Forensic Tools. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering (SADFE 2007), pp. 117–130 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pan, L.: A Performance Testing Framework for Digital Forensic Tools. PhD thesis Deakin University (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sloane, N.J.A.: A Library of Orthogonal Arrays, http://www.research.att.com/~njas/oadir/index.html

  13. Taguchi, G.: Introduction to Quality Engineering: Designing Quality Into Produces and Processes. White Plains (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taguchi, G., Chowdhury, S., Wu, Y.: Taguchi’s Quality Engineering Handbook. Wiley, Chichester (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilsdon, T., Slay, J.: Digital Forensics: Exploring Validation, Verification and Certification. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering (SADFE 2005), pp. 48–55 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Youden, W.J.: Statistical techniques for collaborative tests. In: Statistical Manual of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, p. v–63 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou, J., Zhu, H.: Robust Estimation and Design Procedures for the Random Effects Model. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 31(1), 99–110 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pan, L., Batten, L.M. (2009). Robust Correctness Testing for Digital Forensic Tools. In: Sorell, M. (eds) Forensics in Telecommunications, Information and Multimedia. e-Forensics 2009. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02312-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02312-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02311-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02312-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics