Skip to main content

Consistency Measure of Multiple Classifiers for Land Cover Classification by Remote Sensing Image

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 5519))

Abstract

Nowadays, multiple classifier system is widely used for land cover classification by remote sensing imagery. The performance of combined classifier is closely related to the selection of member classifiers, so it is necessary to analyze the diversity and consistency of member classifiers. In our study, consistency measures are studied and experimented from three levels: general consistency measure, binary prior measure and consistency of errors, and the result shows that it is feasible to find the effective set of member classifiers by some consistency measures. In land cover classification by remotely sensed classifiers, we can select optimal member classifiers by integrating different consistency criterions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Foody, G.M.: Status of Land Cover Classification Accuracy Assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment (80), 185–201 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benediktsson, J.A., Chanussot, J., Fauvel, M.: Multiple classifiers system in remote sensing: from basics to recent developments. In: Haindl, M., Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4472, pp. 501–512. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang, H.J., Doermann, D.: Selection of Classifiers for the Construction of Multiple Classifier Systems. In: Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, pp. 1194–1198 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kang, H.J., Lee, S.W.: Experimental Results on the Construction of Multiple Classifiers Recognizing Handwritten Numerals. In: Proc. of the 6th ICDAR, pp. 1026–1030 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petrakos, M., Benediktsson, J.A.: The Effect of Classifier Agreement on the Accuracy of the Combined Classifier in Decision Level Fusion. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39(11), 2539–2545 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shan, B.: Studies on Methods of Evaluating Agreement among Multiple Investigators (Methods of Measurement). Dissertation of Academy of Military Medical Sciences of PLR of China (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aksela, M., Laaksonen, J.: Using Diversity of Errors for Selecting Members of A Committee Classifier. Pattern Recognition (39), 608–623 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, J.: A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Congalton, R.: A Review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classifications of Remotely Sensed Data. Remote Sensing of Environment (37), 35–46 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fleiss, J.L.: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Wiley, New York (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, D., Sirlantzis, K., Dong, H., et al.: On the Relation between Dependence and Diversity in Multiple Classifier Systems. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing, vol. (1), pp. 134–139 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Giancinto, G., Roli, F.: Design of Effective Neural Network Ensembles for Image Classification Purposes. Image Vision Computer (19), 697–705 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bedau, M., Zwick, M., Bahm, A.: Variance and Uncertainty Measures of Population Diversity Dynamics. Adv. Syst. Sci. Appl (Special issue I), 7–12 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kittler, J., Hatef, M., Duin, R.P.W., Matas, J.: On Combining Classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(3), 226–239 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lam, L.: Classifier Combinations: Implementations and Theoretical Issues. In: Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1857, pp. 77–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Bo, Y.C., Wang, J.F.: Combining Multiple Classifiers for Thematic Classification of Remotely Sensed Data. Journal of Remote Sensing 9(5), 557–562 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Han, D.Q., Han, C.Z., Yang, Y.: Combination of Heterogeneous Multiple Classifiers Based on Evidence Theory. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Wavelet Analysis and Pattern Recognition, pp. 573–578 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Congalton, R.G., Green, K.: Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data. In: Principles and Practices. Lewis Publishers (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Suen, C.Y., Lam, L.: Multiple Classifier Combination Methodologies for Different Output Levels. In: Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1857, p. 52. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Han, J.F., Yang, Z.H.: Combined Classifiers and Its Application in Hyperspectral Classification. Journal of Zhengzhou Institute of Surveying and Mapping 24(3), 231–234 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aitkenhead, M.J.: A co-evolving decision tree classification method. Expert Systems with Applications 1, 18–25 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jens, K., Simone, N., et al.: Automatic land cover analysis for Tenerife by supervised classification using remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 86(4), 530–541 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nello, C., John, S.: An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods, p. 82. Cambridge University Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chai, S., Veenendaal, B., et al.: Backpropagation Neural Network for Soil Moisture Retrieval Using Nafe 2005 Data: A Comparison of Different Training Algorithms. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Beijing, vol. XXXVII, Part B4 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kruse, F.A., Boardman, J.W., et al.: The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS): Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sensing of Environment 44, 145–163 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Du, P., Li, G., Zhang, W., Wang, X., Sun, H. (2009). Consistency Measure of Multiple Classifiers for Land Cover Classification by Remote Sensing Image. In: Benediktsson, J.A., Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds) Multiple Classifier Systems. MCS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5519. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02326-2_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02326-2_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02325-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02326-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics