Skip to main content

Stacking for Ensembles of Local Experts in Metabonomic Applications

  • Conference paper
Multiple Classifier Systems (MCS 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 5519))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently, Ensembles of local experts have successfully been applied for the automatic detection of drug-induced organ toxicities based on spectroscopic data. For suitable Ensemble composition an expert selection optimization procedure is required that identifies the most relevant classifiers to be integrated. However, it has been observed that Ensemble optimization tends to overfit on the training data. To tackle this problem we propose to integrate a stacked classifier optimized via cross-validation that is based on the outputs of local experts. In order to achieve probabilistic outputs of Support Vector Machines used as local experts we apply a sigmoidal fitting approach. The results of an experimental evaluation on a challenging data set from safety pharmacology demonstrate the improved generalizability of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nicholson, J.K., et al.: Metabonomics: a platform for studying drug toxicity and gene function. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 1, 153–161 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lienemann, K., Plötz, T., Pestel, S.: NMR-based urine analysis in rats: Prediction of proximal tubule kidney toxicity and phospholipidosis. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 58, 41–49 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolpert, D.H.: Stacked generalization. Neural Networks 5, 241–259 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Holmes, E., et al.: Development of a model for classification of toxin-induced lesions using 1H NMR spectroscopy of urine combined with pattern recognition. NMR in Biomedicine 11, 235–244 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fieno, T., Viswanathan, V., Tsoukalas, L.: Neural network methodology for 1H NMR spectroscopy classification. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Information Intelligence and Systems, pp. 80–85 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beckonert, O., et al.: NMR-based metabonomic toxicity classification: hierarchical cluster analysis and k-nearest-neighbour approaches. Analytica Chimica Acta 490, 3–15 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebbels, T., et al.: Toxicity classification from metabonomic data using a density superposition approach: CLOUDS. Analytica Chimica Acta 490, 109–122 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindon, J.C., et al.: Contemporary issues in toxicology the role of metabonomics in toxicology and its evaluation by the COMET project. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 187, 137–146 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Specht, D.F.: Probabilistic neural networks. Neural Networks 3, 109–118 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lienemann, K., Plötz, T., Fink, G.A.: On the application of SVM-Ensembles based on adapted random subspace sampling for automatic classification of NMR data. In: Haindl, M., Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4472, pp. 42–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lienemann, K., Plötz, T., Fink, G.A.: Automatic classification of NMR spectra by ensembles of local experts. In: Structural, Syntactic, and Statistical Pattern Recognition. LNCS, vol. 5342, pp. 790–800. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Breiman, L.: Stacked regressions. Machine Learning 24, 49–64 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ting, K.M., Witten, I.H.: Issues in stacked generalization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 10, 271–289 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. dos Santos, E.M., et al.: Overfitting in the selection of classifier ensembles: a comparative study between PSO and GA. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, pp. 1423–1424. ACM, New York (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Platt, J.C.: Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. In: Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, pp. 61–74. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, H.T., Lin, C.J., Weng, R.: A note on platt’s probabilistic outputs for support vector machines. Machine Learning 68, 267–276 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matthews, B.W.: Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of the T4 phage lysozyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 405, 442–451 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Machine Learning 45, 5–32 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wold, H.: Estimation and Prediciton. In: Estimation of Principal Components and Related Models by Iterative Least Squares, pp. 391–420. Academic Press, London (1966)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lienemann, K., Plötz, T., Fink, G.A. (2009). Stacking for Ensembles of Local Experts in Metabonomic Applications. In: Benediktsson, J.A., Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds) Multiple Classifier Systems. MCS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5519. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02326-2_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02326-2_50

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02325-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02326-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics