Skip to main content

Designing Capital-Intensive Systems with Architectural and Operational Flexibility Using a Screening Model

  • Conference paper
Book cover Complex Sciences (Complex 2009)

Abstract

Development of capital intensive systems, such as offshore oil platforms or other industrial infrastructure, generally requires a significant amount of capital investment under various resource, technical, and market uncertainties. It is a very challenging task for development co-owners or joint ventures because important decisions, such as system architectures, have to be made while uncertainty remains high. This paper develops a screening model and a simulation framework to quickly explore the design space for complex engineering systems under uncertainty allowing promising strategies or architectures to be identified. Flexibility in systems’ design and operation is proposed as a proactive means to enable systems to adapt to future uncertainty. Architectural and operational flexibility can improve systems’ lifecycle value by mitigating downside risks and capturing upside opportunities. In order to effectively explore different flexible strategies addressing a view of uncertainty which changes with time, a computational framework based on Monte Carlo simulation is proposed in this paper. This framework is applied to study flexible development strategies for a representative offshore petroleum project. The complexity of this problem comes from multi-domain uncertainties, large architectural design space, and structure of flexibility decision rules. The results demonstrate that architectural and operational flexibility can significantly improve projects’ Expected Net Present Value (ENPV), reduce downside risks, and improve upside gains, compared to adopting an inflexible strategy appropriate to the view of uncertainty at the start of the project. In this particular case study, the most flexible strategy improves ENPV by 85% over an inflexible base case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. de Weck, O.L., de Neufville, R., Chaize, M.: Staged Deployment of Communications Satellite Constellations in Low Earth Orbit. Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information, and Communication 1(3), 119–136 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hassan, R., de Neufville, R., de Weck, O., Hastings, D., McKinnon, D.: Value- at-Risk Analysis for Real Options in Complex Engineered Systems. In: IEEE International Conference on Large Scale Infrastructure Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2005, Hawaii (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, T., de Neufville, R.: Identification of Real Options "in" Projects. In: 16th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), Orlando (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao, T., Tseng, C.L.: Valuing Flexibility in Infrastructure Expansion. ASCE Journal of Infrastructure Systems 9(3), 89–97 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ford, D.N., Lander, D.M., Voyer, J.J.: A Real Options Approach to Valuing Strategic Flexibility in Uncertain Construction Project. Construction Management and Economics 20, 343–351 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ajah, A.N., Herder, P.M.: Addressing Flexibility during Process and Infrastructure Systems Conceptual Design: Real Options Perspective. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 4, pp. 3711–3716 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lund, M.: Valuing Flexibility in Offshore Petroleum Projects. Annual of Operations Research 99, 325–349 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, J.: Exploring Flexible Strategies in Engineering Systems Using Screening Models – Applications to Offshore Petroleum Projects. Ph.D. thesis, Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Watkins, G.C.: Characteristics of North Sea Oil Reserve Appreciation. MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, MIT-CEEPR 00-008 working Paper (2000), http://web.mit.edu/ceepr/www/publications/workingpapers/2000-008.pdf

  10. Roy, R.K.: A primer on the Taguchi Method. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lin, J., de Weck, O., de Neufville, R., Robinson, B., MacGowan, D. (2009). Designing Capital-Intensive Systems with Architectural and Operational Flexibility Using a Screening Model. In: Zhou, J. (eds) Complex Sciences. Complex 2009. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 5. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02469-6_70

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02469-6_70

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02468-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02469-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics