Skip to main content

A Metrics Review for Performance Evaluation on Assisted Wheelchair Navigation

  • Conference paper
Book cover Bio-Inspired Systems: Computational and Ambient Intelligence (IWANN 2009)

Abstract

In nowadays aging society, many people require assistance for non-pedestrian mobility. In some cases, assistive devices require a certain degree of autonomy when the persons’ disabilities difficult manual control. In this field, it is important to rate user performance to check how much help he/she needs. This paper presents an overview of common metrics for wheelchair navigation, plus some proposed by authors to take into account new approaches to wheelchair control. We present an example of proposed metrics on a robotized Meyra wheelchair at Santa Lucia Hospedale in Rome to prove their meaning and adequacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Morris, A., Donamukkala, R., Kapuria, A., Steinfeld, A., Matthews, J.T., Dunbar-Jacob, J., Thrun, S.: A robotic walker that provides guidance. In: Proc. of the 2003 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, Taiwan, September 2003, pp. 25–30 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parikh, S.P., Grassi, V., Kumar, V., Okamoto, J.: Usability study of a control framework for an intelligent wheelchair. In: Proc. of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, April 2005, pp. 4745–4750 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. McLachlan, S., Arblaster, J., Liu, D.K., Valls, J., Chenoweth, L.: A multi-stage shared control method for an intelligent mobility assistant. In: Proc. of the 2005 IEEE 9th Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics, Chicago, USA, July 2005, pp. 426–429 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simpson, R., Levine, S.P.: NavChair: An Assistive Wheelchair Navigation System with Automatic Adaptation, pp. 235–255. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Horiguchi, Y., Sawaragi, T.: Effects of probing to adapt machine autonomy in shared control systems. In: Proc. International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Hawaii, USA, October 2005, vol. 1, pp. 317–323 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crisman, J., Cleary, M.: Progress on the deictic controlled whellchair, pp. 137–149. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frese, U., Larsson, P., Duckett, T.: A multigrid algorithm for simultaneous localization and mapping. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 21(2), 1–12 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lawton, M., Brody, E.: Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist (9), 179–185 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crum, R., Anthony, J., Bassett, S., Folstein, M.: Population-based norms for the mini-mental state examination by age and educational level. Journal of the American Medical Association 269(18), 2386–2390 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yesavage, J., Brink, T., Rose, T., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., Leirer, V.: Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research 17, 37–49 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mahoney, F., Barthel, D.: Functional evaluation: the barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal (14), 56–61 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kilkens, O., Post, M., Dallmeijer, A., Seelen, H., van der Woude, L.: Wheelchair skills tests: a systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation 17(4), 418–430 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Webster, J., Cottam, G., Gouvier, W., Blanton, P., Beissel, G., Wofford, J.: Wheelchair obstacle course performance in right cerebral vascular accident victims. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. (11), 295–310 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cooperstock, J., Pineau, J., Precup, D., Atrash, A., Jaulmes, R., Kaplow, R., Lin, N., Prahacs, C., Villemure, J., Yamani, H.: Smartwheeler: A robotic wheelchair test-bed for investigating new models of human-robot interaction. In: Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Intell. Robots and Systems (IROS), San Diego, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Parikh, S., Rao, R., Sang-Hack, J., Vijay, K., Ostrowski, J., Taylor, C.: Human robot interaction and usability studies for a smart wheelchair. In: Proc. of the IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2003 (IROS 2003), October 27-31, 2003, vol. 4(3), pp. 3206–3211 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Urdiales, C., Peula, J.M., Barrue, C., Cortes, U., Sandoval, F., Caltagirone, C., Annichiaricco, R.: An adaptive scheme for wheelchair navigation collaborative control. In: Asociation for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2008), Chicago, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khoury, G.J., Kondraske, G.V.: Measurement and continuous monitoring of humanworkload associated with manual control devices. NASA JSC, Houston, TX, Tech. Rep. 91-011R (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hart, S., Staveland, L.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research, pp. 5–39. Elsevier, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scherer, M., Jutai, J., Fuhrer, M., Demers, L., DeRuyter, F.: A framework for modeling the selection of assistive technology devices (atds). Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2(1), 1–8 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gatti, N., Matteucci, M., Sbattella, L.: An adaptive and predictive environment to support augmentative and alternative communication. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Burger, D. (eds.) ICCHP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3118, pp. 983–990. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Mills, T., Holm, M., Trefler, E., Schmeler, M., Fitzgerald, S., Boninger, M.: Development and consumer validation of the functional evaluation in a wheelchair (few) instrument. Disability and Rehabilitation 24, 38–46 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R., Ska, B.: The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): An Overview and Recent Progress, pp. 101–105. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Urdiales, C., Poncela, A., Sanchez-Tato, I., Sandoval, F.: Efficiency based reactive shared control for collaborative human/robot navigation. In: Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Intell. Robots and Systems (IROS 2007), San Diego, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Urdiales, C. et al. (2009). A Metrics Review for Performance Evaluation on Assisted Wheelchair Navigation. In: Cabestany, J., Sandoval, F., Prieto, A., Corchado, J.M. (eds) Bio-Inspired Systems: Computational and Ambient Intelligence. IWANN 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5517. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02478-8_143

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02478-8_143

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02477-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02478-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics