Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5518))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1862 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic literature review to investigate which techniques have been applied to give support to the requirements engineering activity in the development of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS). We reviewed 49 of 389 papers found that were directly related to our goal. The results show that most of the proposals for dealing with requirements (78%) use already defined methods or techniques, and that 67% of these techniques are based on the goal-oriented paradigm. A total of 96% of the reviewed papers focus on techniques for analyzing requirements and only 39% of them explicitly consider some kind of elicitation technique. The results are important for determining current research activities in Requirements Engineering for MAS and for the identification of research gaps for further investigation.

This work is funded by the META project (TIN2006-15175-C05-05) and the Quality-driven model transformations project (UPV).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burmeister, B., Arnold, M., Copaciu, F., Rimassa, G.: BDI-agents for agile goal-oriented business processes. In: AAMAS (Industry Track), pp. 37–44 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dehlinger, J., Lutz Robyn, R.: A product-line requirements approach to safe reuse in multi-agent systems. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 30(4), 1–7 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Henderson-Sellers, B., Giorgini, P. (eds.): Agent-Oriented Methodologies. Idea Group (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Joint Technical Report Software Engineering Group, Keele University, United Kingdom and Empirical Software Engineering, National ICT Australia Ltd, Australia (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ranjan, P., Misra, A.K.: A hybrid model for agent based system requirements analysis. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 31(3), 1–7 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilmann, D., Sterling, L.: Guiding agent-oriented requirements elicitation: HOMER. QSIC 2005, 419–424 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.: Developing multiagent systems: The Gaia methodology. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 12(3), 317–370 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Blanes, D., Insfran, E., Abrahão, S. (2009). Reviewing the Use of Requirements Engineering Techniques in the Development of Multi-Agent Systems. In: Omatu, S., et al. Distributed Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Bioinformatics, Soft Computing, and Ambient Assisted Living. IWANN 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5518. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02481-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02481-8_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02480-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02481-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics