Skip to main content

Distance-Based Semantics for C-Structure Belief Revision

  • Conference paper
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5590))

Abstract

In [1], the authors have extended Parikh’s relevance-sensitive model for belief revision by defining a new model for belief representation and local belief revision called C-structure Model. This model allows to make local revision when Parikh’s model fails to do it: the case of “fully overlapping belief sets”. Using Grove’s system of spheres construction, we consider additional constraints to define an ordering between interpretations, and show that these constraints allow to formalize perfectly the local revision by the mean of C-structure model, thus providing a well defined semantics for revision of C-structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Doukari, O., Würbel, E., Jeansoulin, R.: A new model for belief representation and belief revision based on inconsistencies locality. In: 19th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, ICTAI 2007, Patras, Greece, pp. 262–269. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eiter, T., Gottlob, G.: On the complexity of propositional knowledge base revision, updates, and counterfactuals. Artificial Intelligence 57(2-3), 227–270 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Liberatore, P., Schaerf, M.: The complexity of model checking for belief revision and update. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1996), pp. 556–561. AAAI Press/The MIT Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nebel, B.: How hard is it to revise a belief base? In: Dubois, D., Prade, H. (eds.) Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems. Belief Change, vol. 3, pp. 77–145. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bennaim, J., Benferha, S., Papini, O., Würbel, E.: An answer set programming encoding of prioritized removed sets revision: application to GIS. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3229, pp. 604–616. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams, M.A.: Applications of belief revision. In: ILPS 1997: International Seminar on Logic Databases and the Meaning of Change, Transactions and Change in Logic Databases, London, UK, pp. 287–316. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Würbel, E., Papini, O., Jeansoulin, R.: Revision: an application in the framework of GIS. In: 7th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2000, Breckenridge, Colorado, USA, pp. 505–516 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parikh, R.: Beliefs, belief revision, and splitting languages. Logic, language and computation 2, 266–278 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chopra, S., Parikh, R.: Relevance sensitive belief structures. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 28, 259–285 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. J. Symb. Logic 50, 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Grove, A.: Two modelings for theory change. Philosophical Logic 17, 157–170 (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Herzig, A., Rifi, O.: Propositional belief base update and minimal change. Artificial Intelligence 115, 107–138 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chopra, S., Parikh, R., Wassermann, R.: Approximate belief revision. Logic J. IGPL 9, 755–768 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Peppas, P., Chopra, S., Foo, N.Y.: Distance semantics for relevance-sensitive belief revision. In: 9th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2004, Canada, pp. 319–328 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Doukari, O., Würbel, E., Jeansoulin, R. (2009). Distance-Based Semantics for C-Structure Belief Revision. In: Sossai, C., Chemello, G. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5590. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02906-6_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02905-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02906-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics