Skip to main content

Stability under Strategy Switching

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5635))

Abstract

We suggest that a process-like notion of strategy is relevant in the context of interactions in systems of self-interested agents. In this view, strategies are not plans formulated by rational agents considering all possible futures and (mutually recursively) taking into account strategies employed by other players. Instead, they are partial; players start with a set of potential strategies and dynamically switch between them. This necessitates some means in the model for players to access each others’ strategies, and we suggest a syntax by which players’ rationale for such switching may be specified and structurally composed. In such a model one can ask a stability question: given a game arena and a strategy specification, whether players eventually settle down to strategies without further switching. We show that this problem can be algorithmically solved using automata theoretic methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A., Kupferman, O.: Alternating-time temporal logic. Journal of ACM 49(5), 672–713 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold, T., Schwalbe, U.: Dynamic coalition formation and the core. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 49, 363–380 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonanno, G.: Modal logic and game theory: Two alternative approaches. Risk Decision and Policy 7, 309–324 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghosh, S.: Strategies made explicit in dynamic game logic. Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Horst, U.: Dynamic systems of social interactions. In: NSF/CEME Mathematical Economics Conference at Berkeley (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ramanujam, R., Simon, S.: Dynamic logic on games with structured strategies. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 49–58 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Skyrms, B., Pemantle, R.: A dynamic model of social network formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97(16), 9340–9346 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. van Benthem, J.: Games in dynamic epistemic logic. Bulletin of Economic Research 53(4), 219–248 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. van Benthem, J.: Extensive games as process models. Journal of Logic Language and Information 11, 289–313 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. van der Hoek, W., Jamroga, W., Wooldridge, M.: A logic for strategic reasoning. In: Proceedings of AAMAS, pp. 157–164 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Cooperation, knowledge, and time: Alternating-time temporal epistemic logic and its applications. Studia Logica 75(1), 125–157 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Vos, M.D., Vermeir, D.: A logic for modeling decision making with dynamic preferences. In: Brewka, G., Moniz Pereira, L., Ojeda-Aciego, M., de Guzmán, I.P. (eds.) JELIA 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1919, pp. 391–406. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Vos, M.D., Vermeir, D.: Dynamic decision-making in logic programming and game theory. In: McKay, B., Slaney, J.K. (eds.) Canadian AI 2002. LNCS, vol. 2557, pp. 36–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Weibull, J.W.: Evolutionary Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Young, H.P.: The evolution of conventions. In: Econometrica, vol. 61, pp. 57–84. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Young, H.P.: The diffusion of innovations in social networks. Economics Working Paper Archive 437, The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Economics (May 2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Paul, S., Ramanujam, R., Simon, S. (2009). Stability under Strategy Switching. In: Ambos-Spies, K., Löwe, B., Merkle, W. (eds) Mathematical Theory and Computational Practice. CiE 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5635. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03073-4_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03073-4_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03072-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03073-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics