Skip to main content

Acyclic Preferences and Existence of Sequential Nash Equilibria: A Formal and Constructive Equivalence

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5674))

Abstract

In a game from game theory, a Nash equilibrium (NE) is a combination of one strategy per agent such that no agent can increase its payoff by unilaterally changing its strategy. Kuhn proved that all (tree-like) sequential games have NE. Osborne and Rubinstein abstracted over these games and Kuhn’s result: they proved a sufficient condition on agents’ preferences for all games to have NE. This paper proves a necessary and sufficient condition, thus accounting for the game-theoretic frameworks that were left aside. The proof is formalised using Coq, and contrary to usual game theory it adopts an inductive approach to trees for definitions and proofs. By rephrasing a few game-theoretic concepts, by ignoring useless ones, and by characterising the proof-theoretic strength of Kuhn’s/Osborne and Rubinstein’s development, this paper also clarifies sequential game theory. The introduction sketches these clarifications, while the rest of the paper details the formalisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous. Program evaluation research task. Summary report Phase 1 and 2, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berthot, Y., Castéran, P.: Interactive Theorem Proving and Program Development Coq’Art: The Calculus of Inductive Constructions. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackwell, D.: An analog of the minimax theorem for vector payoffs. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 6, 1–8 (1956)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanqui, F., Coupet-Grimal, S., Delobel, W., Hinderer, S., Koprowski, A.: CoLoR, a Coq Library on rewriting and termination. In: Workshop on Termination (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kahn, A.B.: Topological sorting of large networks. Commun. ACM 5(11), 558–562 (1962)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Knuth, D.E.: The Art of Computer Programming, 2nd edn., vol. 1. Addison Wesley, Reading (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kreps, D.M.: Notes on the Theory of Choice. Westview Press, Inc., Boulder (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krieger, T.: On pareto equilibria in vector-valued extensive form games. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 58, 449–458 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuhn, H.W.: Extensive games and the problem of information. Contributions to the Theory of Games II (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lasser, D.J.: Topological ordering of a list of randomly-numbered elements of a network. Commun. ACM 4(4), 167–168 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Le Roux, S.: Non-determinism and Nash equilibria for sequential game over partial order. In: Computational Logic and Applications, CLA 2005. Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Le Roux, S.: Acyclicity and finite linear extendability: a formal and constructive equivalence. In: Schneider, K., Brandt, J. (eds.) Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics: Emerging Trends Proceedings, September 2007, pp. 154–169. Department of Computer Science, University of Kaiserslautern (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Le Roux, S.: Generalisation and formalisation in game theory. Ph.d. thesis, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon (January 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Le Roux, S., Lescanne, P., Vestergaard, R.: A discrete Nash theorem with quadratic complexity and dynamic equilibria. Research report IS-RR-2006-006, JAIST (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jarnagin, M.P.: Automatic machine methods of testing pert networks for consistency. Technical Memorandum K-24/60, U. S. Naval Weapons Laboratory, Dahlgren, Va (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Pratt, V.: Origins of the calculus of binary relations. In: Logic in Computer Science (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Selten, R.: Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfrageträgheit. Zeitschrift für die desamte Staatswissenschaft 121 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Simon, H.A.: A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(1), 99–118 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Szpilrajn, E.: Sur l’extension de l’ordre partiel. Fund. Math. 16 (1930)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vestergaard, R.: A constructive approach to sequential Nash equilibria. Information Processing Letter 97, 46–51 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zermelo, E.: Über eine Anwendung der Mengenlehre auf die Theorie des Schachspiels. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Mathematicians, vol. 2 (1912)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Le Roux, S. (2009). Acyclic Preferences and Existence of Sequential Nash Equilibria: A Formal and Constructive Equivalence. In: Berghofer, S., Nipkow, T., Urban, C., Wenzel, M. (eds) Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics. TPHOLs 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5674. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03359-9_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03359-9_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03358-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03359-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics