Skip to main content

Building-Up a Reference Generic Regulation Ontology: A Bottom-Up Approach

  • Conference paper
Business Information Systems Workshops (BIS 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 37))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop a Reference Normative Ontology. This generic ontology is being developed in order to allow modeling policy-based regulations. Such modeling is for creating models of norms and rules and can be used by a larger framework for compliance checking. The modeling of regulations using this ontology can be showcased for semantic business process management. Our study is based on 3 domain case-specific ontologies describing norms and behavioral standards within Web portals. The analysis of those concrete, small ontologies allows building an abstract, generic ontology which is destined to cover core aspects most of other specific regulation examples. This ontology is designed to grow by integrating additional case-specific normative documents and serve as the core component of a generic regulation modeling ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. El-Kharbili, M., Pulvermüller, E.: A Semantic Framework for Compliance Management in Business Process Management (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kharbili, M.E., Stein, S., Markovic, I., Pulvermüller, E.: Towards Policy-Powered Semantic Enterprise Compliance Management – Discussion Paper. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 16–21 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Despres, S., Szulman, S.: Construction of a Legal Ontology from a European Community Legislative Text, pp. 79–88. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gangemi, A.: Design patterns for legal ontology construction, http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-321/paper4.pdf

  5. Visser, P.R.S., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Ontologies in the Design of Legal Knowledge Systems (1999), https://eprints.kfupm.edu.sa/55792/1/55792.pdf

  6. Boer, A., van Engers, T., Winkels, R.: Using ontologies for comparing and harmonizing legislation, pp. 60–69. ACM, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nagy, M., Vargas-Vera, M., Stolarski, P., Motta, E.: DSSim results for OAEI 2008. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Ontology Matching (OM 2008), Karlsruhe, Germany, October 26. CEUR WS, vol. 431 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bourcier, D., de Rosnay, M.D., Legrand, J.: Methodological perspectives for legal ontologies building: an interdisciplinary experience, pp. 240–241. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Surden, H., Genesereth, M., Logu, B.: Research abstracts 2: Representational complexity in law, pp. 193–194. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.: Computer Representation of the Law. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1985, pp. 1269–1270 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Warnier, M., Brazier, F., Apistola, M., Oskamp, A.: Towards automatic identification of completeness and consistency in digital dossiers, pp. 177–181. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tomaszewski, T., Stolarski, P.: Legal Framework for eCommerce Tax Analysis. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Picard, W. (eds.) Pervasive Collaborative Networks, IFIP TC 5 WG 5.5 Ninth Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises, Poznan, Poland. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Filipowska, A., Kaczmarek, M., Starzecka, M., Stolarski, P., Walczak, A.: Semantic Enterprise Description for the Needs of Business Process Automation SemBPM. In: COMPSAC 2008, pp. 987–992 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Elhag, A.A.O., Breuker, J.A., Brouwer, B.W.: On the Formal Analysis of Normative Conflicts. In: van den Herik, H., et al. (eds.) JURIX 1999: The Twelfth Annual Conference, GNI, pp. 35–46 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hage, J.: Rule consistency. In: van den Herik, H., et al. (eds.) JURIX 1999: The Twelfth Annual Conference, GNI (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bench-Capon, T., Giovann, S.: Using values and theories to resolve disagreement in law. In: JURIX 2000: The 13th Annual Conference, GNI (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

El Kharbili, M., Stolarski, P. (2009). Building-Up a Reference Generic Regulation Ontology: A Bottom-Up Approach. In: Abramowicz, W., Flejter, D. (eds) Business Information Systems Workshops. BIS 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 37. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03424-4_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03424-4_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03423-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03424-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics