Skip to main content

Bidding for Complex Projects: Evidence from Italian Government’s Acquisitions of IT Services

  • Conference paper
Electronic Government (EGOV 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5693))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Public buyers are often mandated by law to adopt competitive procedures to ensure transparency and promote full competition. Recent economic literature, however, suggests that open competition can perform poorly in allocating complex projects. In exploring the determinants of bidding behavior in tenders for complex IT services, we find results that appear consistent with theory. Our analysis shows that price and quality are linked in a puzzling way: high quality is associated with low prices. We also find that quality proposals are mainly explained by suppliers’ experience. Results suggest that scoring rules at the basis of the tendering process might fail to appropriately incorporate buyers’ complex price/quality preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albano, G.L., Bianchi, M., Spagnolo, G.: Bid Average Methods in Procurement. In: Piga, G., Thai, K. (eds.) The Economics of Public Procurement. Palgrave (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asker, J., Cantillon, E.: Properties of Scoring Auctions. Forthcoming, Rand Journal of Economics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bajari, P., McMillan, R., Tadelis, S.: Auctions vs. Negotiation in Procurement: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization (forthcoming, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bajari, P., Houghton, S., Tadelis, S.: Bidding for Incomplete Contracts: An Empirical Analysis of Adaptation Costs. NBER Working Paper No. 12051 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bajari, P., Tadelis, S.: Incentives Versus Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procurement Contracts. Rand Journal of Economics 32(3), 287–307 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Che, Y.-K.: Design Competition through Multidimensional Auctions. Rand Journal of Economics 28, 668–680 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimitri, N., Dini, F., Pacini, R., Valletti, T.: Scoring Rules. In: Dimitri, N., Piga, G., Spagnolo, G. (eds.) Handbook of Procurement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Georgia Institute of Technology, http://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/1853/19765/1/zhong_fang_200712_phd.pdf

  9. Goldberg, V.P.: Competitive Bidding and the Production of Precontract Information. Bell Journal of Economics 8, 250–261 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, H.I.: A Model of Selective Tendering: Does Bidding Competition Deter Opportunism by Contractors? Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 3(4), 907–925 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lundberg, S.: Auction Formats and Award Rules in Swedish Procurement Auctions. CERUM Working Paper No. 79 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Manelli, A.M., Vincent, D.R.: Optimal Procurement Mechanisms. Econometrica 63(3), 591–620 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhong, F.V.: Empirical Analyses of Online Procurement auctions: Business Value, Bidding Behavior, Learning and Incumbent Effect. Ph. D. Dissertation, College of Management. Georgia Institute of Technology (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Albano, G.L., Dini, F., Zampino, R. (2009). Bidding for Complex Projects: Evidence from Italian Government’s Acquisitions of IT Services. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Traunmüller, R. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5693. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03516-6_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03516-6_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03515-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03516-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics