Skip to main content

Grounding Geographic Categories in the Meaningful Environment

  • Conference paper
Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5756))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Ontologies are a common approach to improve semantic interoperability by explicitly specifying the vocabulary used by a particular information community. Complex expressions are defined in terms of primitive ones. This shifts the problem of semantic interoperability to the problem of how to ground primitive symbols. One approach are semantic datums, which determine reproducible mappings (measurement scales) from observable structures to symbols. Measurement theory offers a formal basis for such mappings. From an ontological point of view, this leaves two important questions unanswered. Which qualities provide semantic datums? How are these qualities related to the primitive entities in our ontology? Based on a scenario from hydrology, we first argue that human or technical sensors implement semantic datums, and secondly that primitive symbols are definable from the meaningful environment,a formalized quality space established through such sensors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barsalou, L.W.: Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59, 617–645 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett, B.: A Categorical Axiomatisation of Region-Based Geometry. Fundamenta Informaticae 46, 145–158 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennett, B.: Physical Objects, Identity and Vagueness. In: Fensel, D., McGuinness, D., Williams, M.A. (eds.) Proc. of the \(8^{\text{th}}\) International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Repr. and Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett, B., Cohn, A.G., Torrini, P., Hazarika, S.M.: A Foundation for Region-Based Qualitative Geometry. In: Horn, W. (ed.) Proc. \(14^{\text{th}}\) European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 204–208. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett, B., Mallenby, D., Third, A.: An Ontology for Grounding Vague Geographic Terms. In: Eschenbach, C., Gruninger, M. (eds.) Proc. \(5^{\text{th}}\)Intern. Conf. on Formal Ontology in Information Systems. IOS Press, Saarbrücken (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borgo, S., Guarino, N., Masolo, C.: A Pointless Theory of Space Based on Strong Connection and Congruence. In: Proc. Principles of Knowledge Repr. and Reasoning (KR 1996), Boston (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borgo, S., Guarino, N., Masolo, C.: An Ontological Theory of Pysical Objects. In: Ironi, L. (ed.) Proc. Qualitative Reasoning \(11^{\text{th}}\)Intern. Workshop, Paris (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boumans, M.: Measurement Outside the Laboratory. Pilosophy of Science 72, 850–863 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Casati, R., Varzi, A.: Parts and Places: The Structures of Spatial Representation. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frank, A.: Scale is Introduced by Observation Processes. In: Proc. \(6^{\text{th}}\)Intern. Symp. on Spatial Data Quality, ISSDQ 2009 (2009) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A.: Understanding top-level ontological distinctions. In: Stuckenschmidt, H. (ed.) Proc. IJCAI 2001 workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. LEA Publishers, Hillsdale (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harnad, S.: The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D 42, 335–346 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuhn, W.: Semantic Reference Systems. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Science 17(5), 405–409 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhn, W., Raubal, M.: Implementing Semantic Reference Systems. In: Gould, M., Laurini, R., Coulondre, S. (eds.) \(6^{\text{th}}\)AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, pp. 63–72. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lyon (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Langacker, R.W.: Dynamicity, Fictivity, and Scanning. The Imaginative Basis of Logic and Linguistic Meaning. In: Pecher, D., Zwaan, A. (eds.) Grounding Cognition. The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language and Thinking, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michell, J.: Measurement in Psychology: Critical History of a Methodological Concept. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Probst, F.: Semantic Reference Systems for Observations and Measurements. PhD Thesis, University of Münster (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Probst, F., Espeter, M.: Spatial Dimensionality as Classification Criterion for Qualities. In: Proc. Intern. Conf. on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2006). IOS Press, Baltimore (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Quine, W.V.O.: Word and Object. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1960)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts, F.S., Suppes, P.: Some Problems in the Geometry of Visual Perception. Synthese 17, 173–201 (1967)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, B., Varzi, A.C.: The Niche. Noûs 33, 214–238 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Suppes, P.: Is Visual Space Euclidian? Synthese 35, 397–421 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Suppes, P.: Finitism in Geometry. Erkenntnis 54, 133–144 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Suppes, P.: Transitive Indistinguishability and Approximate Measurement with Standard Finite Ratio-scale Representations. J. Math. Psych. 50, 329–336 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Suppes, P., Zinnes, J.L.: Basic Measurement Theory. In: Luce, R.D., Bush, R.R., Galanter, E. (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, ch. 1, vol. 1 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tarski, A.: What is Elementary Geometry? In: Henkin, L., Suppes, P., Tarski, A. (eds.) The Axiomatic Method with Special Reference to Geometry and Physics, Amsterdam, pp. 16–29 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Scheider, S., Janowicz, K., Kuhn, W. (2009). Grounding Geographic Categories in the Meaningful Environment. In: Hornsby, K.S., Claramunt, C., Denis, M., Ligozat, G. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. COSIT 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5756. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03832-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03832-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03831-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03832-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics