Skip to main content

Merging Qualitative Constraint Networks Defined on Different Qualitative Formalisms

  • Conference paper
Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5756))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of merging qualitative constraint networks (QCNs) defined on different qualitative formalisms. Our model is restricted to formalisms where the entities and the relationships between these entities are defined on the same domain. The method is an upstream step to a previous framework dealing with a set of QCNs defined on the same formalism. It consists of translating the input QCNs into a well-chosen common formalism. Two approaches are investigated: in the first one, each input QCN is translated to an equivalent QCN; in the second one, the QCNs are translated to approximations. These approaches take advantage of two dual notions that we introduce, the ones of refinement and abstraction between qualitative formalisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J.-F.: An interval-based representation of temporal knowledge. In: Proc. of 7th the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 221–226 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cholvy, L.: Reasoning about merging information. Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems 3, 233–263 (1998)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Condotta, J.-F., Kaci, S., Marquis, P., Schwind, N.: Merging qualitative constraints networks using propositional logic. In: Proc. of the 10th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU), pp. 347–358 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Condotta, J.-F., Kaci, S., Schwind, N.: A Framework for Merging Qualitative Constraints Networks. In: Proc. of the 21th FLAIRS Conference, pp. 586–591 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Condotta, J.-F., Ligozat, G., Saade, M.: A qualitative algebra toolkit. In: Proc. of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Information Technologies: from Theory to Applications, ICTTA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Egenhofer, M.-J.: Reasoning about binary topological relations. In: Günther, O., Schek, H.-J. (eds.) SSD 1991. LNCS, vol. 525, pp. 143–160. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Frank, A.U.: Qualitative spatial reasoning about cardinal directions. In: Proc. of the 7th Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 157–167 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gerevini, A., Renz, J.: Combining topological and size information for spatial reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 137(1-2), 1–42 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jonsson, P., Drakengren, T.: A complete classification of tractability in RCC-5. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 6, 211–221 (1997)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Konieczny, S., Lang, J., Marquis, P.: DA2 merging operators. Artificial Intelligence 157(1-2), 49–79 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, S.: Combining topological and directional information for spatial reasoning. In: Proc. of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 435–440 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ligozat, G.: Reasoning about cardinal directions. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 9(1), 23–44 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ligozat, G., Renz, J.: What Is a Qualitative Calculus? A General Framework. In: Zhang, C., Guesgen, H.W., Yeap, W.-K. (eds.) PRICAI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3157, pp. 53–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, J.: Integration of weighted knowledge bases. Artificial Intelligence 83, 363–378 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Pujari, A.K., Kumari, G.V., Sattar, A.: \(\mathcal{INDU}\): An interval duration network. In: Proc. of the 16th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI), pp. 291–303 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ragni, M., Wölfl, S.: Reasoning about topological and positional information in dynamic settings. In: Proc. of the 21th FLAIRS Conference, pp. 606–611 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Randell, D.-A., Cui, Z., Cohn, A.: A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In: Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pp. 165–176 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Renz, J.: Qualitative spatial reasoning with topological information. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Renz, J., Ligozat, G.: Weak Composition for Qualitative Spatial and Temporal Reasoning. In: van Beek, P. (ed.) CP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3709, pp. 534–548. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Renz, J., Mitra, D.: Qualitative direction calculi with arbitrary granularity. In: Zhang, C., Guesgen, H.W., Yeap, W.-K. (eds.) PRICAI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3157, pp. 65–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Revesz, P.Z.: On the semantics of arbitration. Journal of Algebra and Computation 7(2), 133–160 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Condotta, JF., Kaci, S., Marquis, P., Schwind, N. (2009). Merging Qualitative Constraint Networks Defined on Different Qualitative Formalisms. In: Hornsby, K.S., Claramunt, C., Denis, M., Ligozat, G. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. COSIT 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5756. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03832-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03832-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03831-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03832-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics