Skip to main content

Evaluation of Green Suppliers Considering Decision Criteria Dependencies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 634))

Abstract

Purchasing is one of the vital functions within a company and supplier performance evaluation is one of the most important business processes of the purchasing function. Traditionally, companies have considered factors such as price, quality, flexibility, etc. when evaluating suppliers. Meanwhile, increasing pressures urge them to consider green issues. This study proposes a multi-criteria evaluation model for supplier performance evaluation by considering various performance criteria. It is shown that these criteria are not independent, in other words simultaneous satisfaction of two or more criteria is required for a good rating, while unilateral success is ineffective. The conventional weighted mean can not deal with this aspect, and compromise operators are more suitable. In this sense, the operators of the Choquet integral family are interesting and are applied to evaluate the suppliers’ performance for an industrial case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Azzone, G., & Bertele, U. (1994). Exploiting green strategies for competitive advantage. Long Range Planning, 27, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choquet, G. (1953). Theory of capacities. Annales de L’Institut Fourier, 5, 131–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, G. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchase, 2(1), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enarsson, L. (1998). Evaluation of suppliers: how to consider the environment. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 28(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, J. (1995). Political evolution of emas: perspectives from the eu, national governments and industrial groups. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5, 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch, M. (1996). The application of fuzzy integrals in multi-criteria decision-making. European journal of operational research, 89, 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch, M. (1997). K-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 92, 167–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, K., Morton, B., & New, S. (1995). Environmental impact of purchasing in organisations. In 4th Greening of Industry Conference, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, M. (1995). Environmental management and its impact on the operations function. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15, 34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P., Wong, Y., & Chan, F. (2003). Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 138(1–3), 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P., McCloskey, A., McIvor, R. ans Maguire, L., & Glackin, C. (2006). Employing dynamic fuzzy membership functions to assess environmental performance in the supplier selection process. International Journal of Production Research, 44, 2379–2419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, C., & Auster, E. (1990). Proactive environmental management: avoiding the toxic trap. Sloan Management Review, 31(2), 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Işıklar, G., Alptekin, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2007). Application of a hybrid intelligent decision support model in logistics outsourcing. Computers and Operations Research, 34(12), 3701–3714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kongar, E. (2005). A comparative study on multiple criteria heuristic approaches for environmentally benign 3pls selection. In 3rd International Logistics and Supply Chain Congress, pp. 23–24, Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labreuche, C., & Grabisch, M. (2007). The representation of conditional relative importance between criteria. Annals of Operations Research, 154(1), 93–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marichal, J.-L. (2000). An axiomatic approach of the discrete choquet integral as a tool to aggregate interacting criteria. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8(6), 800–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marichal, J.-L., & Roubens, M. (2000). Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set. European Journal of Operational Research, 124, 641–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noci, G. (1997). Designing green vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier’s environmental performance. European Jouranl of Purchasing and Supply Management, 3(2), 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pun, K. (2006). Determinants of environmentally responsible operations: a review. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 23(3), 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J. (1998). Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices. European Journal of Operational Research, 107(1), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J. (2003). A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(4), 397–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugeno, M. (1977). Fuzzy measures and fuzzy integrals: a survey. In M. Gupta, G. Saridis, & B. Gaines (Eds.), Fuzzy automata and decision processes (pp. 89–102). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, G.-H., Ou Yang, Y.-P., Lin, C.-T., & Chen, C.-B. (2005). Hierarchical madm with fuzzy integral for evaluating enterprise intranet web sites. Informatics Sciences, 169, 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. (2006). Green project partnership in the supply chain: the case of the package printing industry. Journal of Cleanear Production, 14, 661–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C., Current, J., & Benton, W. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R., & Gouldson, A. (1993). Environmental Management and Business Strategy. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been financially supported by Galatasaray University Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orhan Feyziog̃lu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Feyziog̃lu, O., Büyüközkan, G. (2010). Evaluation of Green Suppliers Considering Decision Criteria Dependencies. In: Ehrgott, M., Naujoks, B., Stewart, T., Wallenius, J. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Energy and Transportation Systems. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 634. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04045-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics