Skip to main content

A General Testability Theory

  • Conference paper
Book cover CONCUR 2009 - Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5710))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a general framework allowing to classify testing problems into five testability classes. Classes differ in the number of tests we must apply to precisely determine whether the system is correct or not. The conditions that enable/disable finite testability are analyzed. A general method to reduce a testing problem into another is presented. The complexity of finding complete test suites and measuring the suitability of incomplete suites is analyzed.

Work supported by projects TIN2006-15578-C02-01, CCG08-UCM/TIC-4124, and the UCM-BSCH programme (GR58/08 - group number 910606).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernot, G., Gaudel, M.-C., Marre, B.: Software testing based on formal specification: a theory and a tool. Software Engineering Journal 6, 387–405 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brinksma, E., Tretmans, J.: Testing transition systems: An annotated bibliography. In: Cassez, F., Jard, C., Rozoy, B., Dermot, M. (eds.) MOVEP 2000. LNCS, vol. 2067, pp. 187–195. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Do, H., Rothermel, G., Kinneer, A.: Prioritizing JUnit test cases: An empirical assessment and cost-benefits analysis. Empirical Software Engineering 11(1), 33–70 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaston, C., Le Gall, P., Rapin, N., Touil, A.: Symbolic execution techniques for test purpose definition. In: Uyar, M.Ü., Duale, A.Y., Fecko, M.A. (eds.) TestCom 2006. LNCS, vol. 3964, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaudel, M.-C.: Testing can be formal, too. In: Mosses, P.D., Schwartzbach, M.I., Nielsen, M. (eds.) CAAP 1995, FASE 1995, and TAPSOFT 1995. LNCS, vol. 915, pp. 82–96. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hennessy, M.: Algebraic Theory of Processes. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hierons, R.M.: Comparing test sets and criteria in the presence of test hypotheses and fault domains. ACM Trans. on Software Engineering and Methodology 11(4), 427–448 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hierons, R.M.: Verdict functions in testing with a fault domain or test hypotheses. In: ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (2008) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hopcroft, J.E., Karp, R.M.: An n 5/2 algorithm for maximum matchings in bipartite graphs. SIAM Journal on Computing 2(4), 225–231 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, D., Yannakakis, M.: Principles and methods of testing finite state machines: A survey. Proceedings of the IEEE 84(8), 1090–1123 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. López, N., Núñez, M., Rodríguez, I.: Specification, testing and implementation relations for symbolic-probabilistic systems. Theoretical Computer Science 353(1–3), 228–248 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Merayo, M., Núñez, M., Rodríguez, I.: Extending EFSMs to specify and test timed systems with action durations and timeouts. IEEE Transactions on Computers 57(6), 835–844 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Petrenko, A.: Fault model-driven test derivation from finite state models: Annotated bibliography. In: Cassez, F., Jard, C., Rozoy, B., Dermot, M. (eds.) MOVEP 2000. LNCS, vol. 2067, pp. 196–205. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodríguez, I.: A general testability theory: Extended version (2006), http://kimba.mat.ucm.es/ismael/

  15. Rodríguez, I., Merayo, M.G., Núñez, M.: \(\mathcal{HOTL}\): Hypotheses and observations testing logic. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 74(2), 57–93 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Springintveld, J., Vaandrager, F., D’Argenio, P.R.: Testing timed automata. Theoretical Computer Science 254(1-2), 225–257 (2001); Previously appeared as Technical Report CTIT-97-17, University of Twente (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Stoelinga, M., Vaandrager, F.: A testing scenario for probabilistic automata. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 464–477. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Tretmans, J.: Testing concurrent systems: A formal approach. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Mauw, S. (eds.) CONCUR 1999. LNCS, vol. 1664, pp. 46–65. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rodríguez, I. (2009). A General Testability Theory. In: Bravetti, M., Zavattaro, G. (eds) CONCUR 2009 - Concurrency Theory. CONCUR 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5710. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04081-8_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04081-8_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04080-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04081-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics