Skip to main content

Reasoning about Optimal Collections of Solutions

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5732))

Abstract

The problem of finding a collection of solutions to a combinatorial problem that is optimal in terms of an inter-solution objective function exists in many application settings. For example, maximizing diversity amongst a set of solutions in a product configuration setting is desirable so that a wide range of different options is offered to a customer. Given the computationally challenging nature of these multi-solution queries, existing algorithmic approaches either apply heuristics or combinatorial search, which does not scale to large solution spaces. However, in many domains compiling the original problem into a compact representation can support computationally efficient query answering. In this paper we present a new approach to find optimal collections of solutions when the problem is compiled into a multi-valued decision diagram. We demonstrate empirically that for real-world configuration problems, both exact and approximate versions of our methods are effective and are capable of significantly outperforming state-of-the-art search-based techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amilhastre, J., Fargier, H., Marquis, P.: Consistency restoration and explanations in dynamic CSPs-application to configuration. Artificial Intelligence (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hadzic, T., Subbarayan, S., Jensen, R.M., Andersen, H.R., Møller, J., Hulgaard, H.: Fast backtrack-free product configuration using a precompiled solution space representation. In: PETO Conference, DTU-tryk, June 2004, pp. 131–138 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bryant, R.E.: Graph-based algorithms for boolean function manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Computers (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Darwiche, A., Marquis, P.: A knowledge compilation map. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 17, 229–264 (2002)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hebrard, E., Hnich, B., O’Sullivan, B., Walsh, T.: Finding diverse and similar solutions in constraint programming. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2005(July 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hebrard, E., O’Sullivan, B., Walsh, T.: Distance constraints in constraint satisfaction. In: IJCAI, pp. 106–111 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hadzic, T., Hooker, J.N.: Cost-bounded binary decision diagrams for 0-1 programming. In: Van Hentenryck, P., Wolsey, L.A. (eds.) CPAIOR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4510, pp. 84–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Angelsmark, O., Thapper, J.: Algorithms for the maximum hamming distance problem. In: Faltings, B.V., Petcu, A., Fages, F., Rossi, F. (eds.) CSCLP 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3419, pp. 128–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Crescenzi, P., Rossi, G.: On the hamming distance of constraint satisfaction problems. Theor. Comput. Sci. 288(1), 85–100 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Holland, A., O’Sullivan, B.: Weighted super solutions for constraint programs. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2005, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (July 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shimazu, H.: Expertclerk: Navigating shoppers buying process with the combination of asking and proposing. In: IJCAI, pp. 1443–1450 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bailleux, O., Marquis, P.: Some computational aspects of distance-sat. Journal of Automated Reasoning 37(4), 231–260 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Dahllöf, V.: Algorithms for max hamming exact satisfiability. In: Deng, X., Du, D.-Z. (eds.) ISAAC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3827, pp. 829–838. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Smyth, B., McClave, P.: Similarity vs. diversity. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds.) ICCBR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2080, pp. 347–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hadžić, T., Holland, A., O’Sullivan, B. (2009). Reasoning about Optimal Collections of Solutions. In: Gent, I.P. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming - CP 2009. CP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5732. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04244-7_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04244-7_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04243-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04244-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics