Skip to main content

Controlled and Automatic Processing in Animals and Machines with Application to Autonomous Vehicle Control

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5768))

Abstract

There are two modes of control recognised in the cognitive psychological literature. Controlled processing is slow, requires serial attention to sub-tasks, and requires effortful memory retrieval and decision making. In contrast automatic control is less effortful, less prone to interference from simultaneous tasks, and is driven largely by the current stimulus. Neurobiological analogues of these are goal-directed and habit-based behaviour respectively. Here, we suggest how these control modes might be deployed in an engineering solution to Automatic Vehicle Control. We present pilot data on a first step towards instantiating automatised control in the architecture, and suggest a synergy between the engineering and biological investigation of this dual-process approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Styles, E.: The Psychology of Attention. Psychology Press, East Sussex (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Packard, M.G., Knowlton, B.J.: Learning and memory functions of the basal ganglia. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 563–593 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Owen, A.M.: Cognitive planning in humans: neuropsychological, neuroanatomical and neuropharmacological perspectives. Prog. Neurobiol. 53(4), 431–450 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdullah, R., Hussain, A., Warwick, K., Zayed, A.: Autonomous intelligent cruise control using a novel multiple-controller framework incorporating fuzzy-logic based switching and tuning. Neurocomputing (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hussain, A., Gurney, K., Abdullah, R., Chambers, J.: Emergent common functional principles in control theory and the vertebrate brain: A case study with autonomous vehicle control. In: Kůrková, V., Neruda, R., Koutník, J. (eds.) ICANN 2008, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5164, pp. 949–958. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hommel, B., Ridderinkhof, K.R., Theeuwes, J.: Cognitive control of attention and action: issues and trends. Psychol. Res. 66(4), 215–219 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schneider, W., Shiffrin, R.: Controlled and automatic information procxessing i. derection, search and attention. Psychological Review 84, 1–66 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shiffrin, R., Schneider, W.: Controlled and automatic information procxessing ii. perception, learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review 84, 128–190 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Neuman, O.: Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a place for an old theory. In: Printz, W., Sanders, A. (eds.) Cognition and Motor Processes. Springer, Berlin (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Birnboim, S.: The automatic and controlled information-processing dissociation: is it still relevant? Neuropsychol. Rev. 13(1), 19–31 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Graybiel, A.M.: Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31, 359–387 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Adams, C., Dickinson, A.: Instrumental responding following reinforcer devaluation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33, 109–122 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Norman, D., Shallice, T.: Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In: Davidson, R.J., Schwartz, G.E., Shapiro, D. (eds.) Consciousness and Self-Regulation. Plenum Press, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shallice, T.: Specific impairments of planning. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 298, 199–209 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prescott, T.J., Bryson, J.J., Seth, A.K.: Introduction to the theme issue on modelling natural action selection. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 362, 1521–1529 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garforth, J., McHale, S.L., Meehan, A.: Executive attention, task selection and attention-based learning in a neurally controlled simulated robot. Neurocomputing 69(16-18), 1923–1945 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Redgrave, P., Prescott, T.J., Gurney, K.N.: The basal ganglia: a vertebrate solution to the selection problem? Neuroscience 89, 1009–1023 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson, C.J.: Striatal circuitry: categorically selective, or selectively categorical? In: Miller, R., Wickens, J. (eds.) Brain Dynamics and the Striatal Complex. Volume submitted MS, pp. 289–306. Harwood Academic (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yin, H.H., Knowlton, B.J.: The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7(6), 464–476 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dalley, J.W., Cardinal, R.N., Robbins, T.W.: Prefrontal executive and cognitive functions in rodents: neural and neurochemical substrates. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 28(7), 771–784 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Joel, D., Weiner, I.: The organization of the basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits: open interconnected rather than closed segregated. Neuroscience 63, 363–379 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haber, S.N., Fudge, J.L., McFarland, N.R.: Striatonigrostriatal pathways in primates form an ascending spiral from the shell to the dorsolateral striatum. J. Neurosci. 20(6), 2369–2382 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. MacLeod, C.M.: Half a century of research on the stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol. Bull. 109(2), 163–203 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Daw, N.D., Niv, Y., Dayan, P.: Uncertainty-based competition between prefrontal and dorsolateral striatal systems for behavioral control. Nat. Neurosci. 8(12), 1704–1711 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Conatser, R., Wagner, J., Ganta, S., Walker, I.: Diagnosis of automotive electronic throttle control systems. Control Engineering Practice 12, 23–30 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, C.Y.: Adaptive control of a class of nonlinear systems using multiple parameter models. Int. J. Contr. Autom. Sys. 4(4), 428–437 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gurney, K., Hussain, A., Chambers, J., Abdullah, R. (2009). Controlled and Automatic Processing in Animals and Machines with Application to Autonomous Vehicle Control. In: Alippi, C., Polycarpou, M., Panayiotou, C., Ellinas, G. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks – ICANN 2009. ICANN 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5768. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04274-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04274-4_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04273-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04274-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics