Skip to main content

Media Equation Revisited: Do Users Show Polite Reactions towards an Embodied Agent?

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5773))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In human-computer interaction social behavior towards computers like flattery, reciprocity, and politeness have been observed [1]. In order to determine whether the results can be replicated when interacting with embodied conversational agents (ECA), we conducted an experimental study. 63 participants evaluated the ECA Max after a 10-minute conversation. The interview situation was manipulated in three conditions: Being questioned by Max himself, being questioned by paper-and-pencil questionnaire in the same room facing Max, and being questioned by means of a paper-and-pencil questionnaire in another room. Results show that participants were more polite to the ECA in terms of a better evaluation when they were questioned by Max himself compared to when they were questioned more indirectly by paper-and-pencil questionnaire in the same room. In contrast to previous studies [2] it was ruled out that some participants thought of the programmer when they were asked to evaluate the ECA. Additionally, user variables (e.g. gender, computer literacy) show an impact on the on the evaluation of the ECA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nass, C., Sundar, S.: Are Programmers Psychologically Relevant to Human-Computer Interaction? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues 56(1), 81–103 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nass, C., Steuer, J.: Voices, Boxes and Sources of Messages: Computers and Social Actors. Human Communication Research 19(4), 504–527 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Carney, P.: Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer-Based Interviewing Systems. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29(5), 1093–1110 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krämer, N.C.: Social effects of virtual assistants. A review of empirical results with regard to communication. In: Prendinger, H., Lester, J.C., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) IVA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5208, pp. 507–508. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bente, G., Krämer, N.C., Petersen, A., de Ruiter, J.P.: Computer Animated Movement and Person Perception. Methodological Advances in Nonverbal Behavior Research. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 25(3), 151–166 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rickenberg, R., Reeves, B.: The Effects of Animated Characters on Anxiety, Task Performance, and Evaluations of User Interfaces. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2000 Conference, pp. 49–56. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krämer, N.C., Bente, G., Piesk, J.: The Ghost in the Machine. The Influence of Embodied Conversational Agents on User Expectations and User Behaviour in a TV/VCR Application. In: Bieber, G., Kirste, T. (eds.) IMC Workshop 2003, Assistance, Mobility, Applications, pp. 121–128. Frauenhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kopp, S., Gesellensetter, L., Krämer, N.C., Wachsmuth, I.: A conversational agent as museum guide – design and evaluation of a real-world application. In: Panayiotopoulos, T., Gratch, J., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P., Rist, T. (eds.) IVA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3661, pp. 329–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Morkes, J., Kim, E.-Y., Fogg, B.J.: Computers Are Social Actors: A Review of Current Research. In: Friedman, B. (ed.) Moral and Ethical Issues in Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 137–162. CSLI Press, Stanford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., Ahrenberg, L.: Wizard of Oz Studies – Why and How. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 193–200. ACM Press, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., Tannenbaum, P.H.: The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1965)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hoffmann, L., Krämer, N.C., Lam-chi, A., Kopp, S. (2009). Media Equation Revisited: Do Users Show Polite Reactions towards an Embodied Agent?. In: Ruttkay, Z., Kipp, M., Nijholt, A., Vilhjálmsson, H.H. (eds) Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5773. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04380-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04380-2_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04379-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04380-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics