Skip to main content

Steganalysis Based on Difference Image

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 5450))

Abstract

This paper presents a performance comparison between Harmsen’s method and a family of Steganalysis Method based on Difference Image (SMDI), in order to promote steganalysis theory. The theoretical analysis begins from the commonness of SMDI, and is focused on the assessment of the statistical change degree between cover and stego, showing that SMDI outperforms the Harmsen’s method. The paper also analyzes that the improvement owes to two aspects: the larger variance of stego-noise difference and the correlation of adjacent pixels utilized by SMDI. A new detector, which can use the correlation of adjacent pixels in all directions, is proposed by generalizing the definition of difference. Experiments show the better performance of the new detector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fridrich, J., Goljan, M., Du, R.: Detecting LSB Steganography in Color and Gray-scale Images. IEEE Multimedia 8(4), 22–28 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dumitrescu, S., Wu, X., Wang, Z.: Detection of LSB Steganography via Sample Pair Analysis. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing 51(7), 1995–2007 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, T., Ping, X.: A New Approach to Reliable Detection of LSB Steganography in Natural Images. Signal Process. 83(10), 2085–2093 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Luo, X., Wang, Q., Yang, C., Liu, F.: Detection of LTSB Steganography Based on Quartic Equation. In: Proceedings of ICACT 2006, pp. 20–22 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Avcıba, I., Memon, N., Sankur, B.: Steganalysis of Watermarking Techniques Using Image Quality Metrics. In: Proceedings of Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents II. SPIE, vol. 4314, pp. 523–531 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Farid, H.: Detecting Hidden Messages Using Higher-order Statistical Models. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICIP 2002, pp. 905–908 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holotyak, T., Fridrich, J., Voloshynovskiy, S.: Blind Statistical Steganalysis of Additive Steganography Using Wavelet Higher Order Statistics. In: Dittmann, J., Katzenbeisser, S., Uhl, A. (eds.) CMS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3677, pp. 273–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Goljan, M., Fridrich, J., Holotyak, T.: New Blind Steganalysis and its Implications. In: Proceedings of Security, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents. SPIE, pp. 1–13 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harmsen, J., Pearlman, W.: Steganalysis of Additive Noise Modelable Information Hiding. In: Proceedings of. Security, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents VI. SPIE, pp. 131–142 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xuan, G., Shi, Y., Gao, J., et al.: Steganalysis based on Multiple Features Formed by Statistical Moments of Wavelet Characteristic Function. In: Proceedings of Information Hiding Workshop, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 262–277 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, Y., Moulin, P.: Optimized Feature Extraction for Learning-based Image Steganalysis. IEEE Trans. Information Forensics and Security 2(1), 31–45 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sullivan, K., Madhow, U., Chandrasekaran, S., et al.: Steganalysis for Markov Cover Data with Applications to Images. IEEE Trans. Information Forensics and Security 1(2), 275–287 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xuan, G., Cui, X., Shi, Y., et al.: JPEG Steganalysis based on Classwise Non-principal Components Analysis and Mutil-directional Markov Model. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICME 2007, pp. 903–906 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shi, Y., Chen, C., Chen, W.: A Markov Process Based Approach to Effective Attacking JPEG Steganography. In: Camenisch, J.L., Collberg, C.S., Johnson, N.F., Sallee, P. (eds.) IH 2006. LNCS, vol. 4437, pp. 249–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Ker, A.: Steganalysis of LSB Matching In Grayscale Images. IEEE Signal processing letters 12(6), 441–444 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, C., Shi, Y., Chen, W., et al.: Statistical Moments based Universal Steganalysis Using JPEG 2-D Array and 2-D Characteristic Function. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICIP 2006, pp. 105–108 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, Q., Sung, A.H., Chen, Z., Xu, J.: Feature Mining and Pattern Classification for Steganalysis of LSB Matching Steganography in Grayscale Images. Pattern Recognition 41, 56–66 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Marvel, L.M., Boncelet, C.G., Retter, C.T.: Spread Spectrum Image Steganography. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 8(8), 1075–1083 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ker, A.: Improved Detection of LSB Steganography in Grayscale Images. In: Fridrich, J. (ed.) IH 2004. LNCS, vol. 3200, pp. 97–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang, J., Mumford, D.: Statistics of Natural Images and Models. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 541–547 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. McLachlan, G., David, P.: Finite Mixture Models. Wiley, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. USDA NPCS Photo Gallery, http://photogallery.nrcs.nsda.gov

  23. Ben-Bassat, M.: Use of Distance Measures, Information Measures and Error Bounds on Feature Evaluation. In: Krishaiah, P.R., Kanal, L.N. (eds.) Handbook of statistics: Classification, Pattern Recognition and Reduction of Dimensionality, pp. 773–791. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  24. He, J., Huang, J.: A New Approach to Estimating Hidden Message Length in Stochastic Modulation Steganography. In: Barni, M., Cox, I., Kalker, T., Kim, H.-J. (eds.) IWDW 2005. LNCS, vol. 3710, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen, D., Wang, Y.: Universal Steganalysis Algorithm for Additive Noise Modelable Stegranography in Spacial Domain. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition) 37(suppl.), 48–52 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, Z., Pan, X., Shi, L., et al.: Effective Steganalysis Based on Statistical Moments of Differential Characteristic Function. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICCIS 2006, pp. 1195–1198 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fridrich, J., Goljan, M.: Digital Image Steganography Using Stochastic Modulation. In: Proceedings of Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents V, vol. 5020, pp. 191–202. SPIE, San Jose (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sun, Y., Liu, F., Liu, B., Wang, P. (2009). Steganalysis Based on Difference Image. In: Kim, HJ., Katzenbeisser, S., Ho, A.T.S. (eds) Digital Watermarking. IWDW 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5450. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04438-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04438-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04437-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04438-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics