Skip to main content

A Fine-Grained Metric System for the Completeness of Metadata

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 46))

Abstract

Metadata quality is an issue that can be approached from different aspects. Among the most essential properties characterizing a quality metadata record is its sufficiency to describe a resource, which is expressed as the completeness of the record. The paper presents a fine-grained metric system for measuring metadata completeness that is capable of following the hierarchy of metadata as it is set by the metadata schema and admeasuring the effect of multiple values of multi-valued fields. Moreover, it introduces the aspect of the representation level of semantically equivalent information that should be taken into account when measuring completeness. The proposed metric system, based on the definition of completeness of a field, treats several deficiencies of the traditional coarse metrics and offers the ability of targeted measures of completeness throughout the metadata hierarchy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barton, J., Currier, S., Hey, J.M.N.: Building Quality Assurance into Metadata Creation: an Analysis based on the Learning Objects and e-Prints Communities of Practice. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice, pp. 39–48 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bruce, T.R., Hillmann, D.I.: The continuum of metadata quality: defining, expressing, exploiting. In: Hillmann, D.I., Westbrooks, E. (eds.) Metadata in Practice, pp. 238–256, ALA Editions, Chicago (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bui, Y., Park, J.: An assessment of metadata quality: A case study of the national science digital library metadata repository. In: Moukdad, H. (ed.) CAIS/ACSI 2006 Information Science Revisited: Approaches to Innovation (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, http://dublincore.org/

  5. Dushay, N., Hillmann, D.: Analyzing metadata for effective use and re-use. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice, pp. 1–10 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Friesen, N.: International LOM Survey: Report (Draft), http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/403/01/LOM%5FSurvey%5FReport2.doc

  7. Greenberg, J., Spurgin, K., Crystal, A.: AMeGA Automatic Metadata Generation Applications) Project, Final Report, University of North Carolina (2005), http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/lc_amega_final_report.pdf

  8. Greenberg, J.: Metadata and the World Wide Web. In: Dekker, M. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Library and Information Science, pp. 1876–1888 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guinchard, C.: Dublin Core use in libraries: a survey. OCLC Systems & Services 18(1), 40–50 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hillmann, D.I., Phipps, J.: Application profiles: exposing and enforcing metadata quality. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Application Profiles: Theory and Practice, pp. 52–62 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes, B.: Metadata quality evaluation: Experience from the open language archives community. In: Chen, Z., Chen, H., Miao, Q., Fu, Y., Fox, E., Lim, E.-p. (eds.) ICADL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3334, pp. 320–329. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. IEEE. 1484.12.1: Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata. Learning Technology Standards Committee of the IEEE (2002), http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf

  13. Liddy, et al.: Automatic Metadata Generation & Evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp. 401–402 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Margaritopoulos, M., Margaritopoulos, T., Kotini, I., Manitsaris, A.: Automatic metadata generation by utilising pre-existing metadata of related resources. Int. J. Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 3(4), 292–304 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Margaritopoulos, T., Margaritopoulos, M., Mavridis, I., Manitsaris, A.: A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment. In: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Metadata for Semantic and Social Applications, pp. 104–116 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard (METS), http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets

  17. Moen, W., Stewart, E., McClure, C.: Assessing metadata quality: Findings and methodological considerations from an evaluation of the US Government information locator service (GILS). In: Proceedings of the Advances in Digital Libraries Conference, pp. 246–255. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Najjar, J., Ternier, S., Duval, E.: User behavior in learning object repositories: an empirical analysis. In: Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2004 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, AACE, pp. 4373–4379 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Najjar, J., Ternier, S., Duval, E.: The Actual Use of Metadata in ARIADNE: an Empirical Analysis. In: Proceedings of ARIADNE Conference, pp. 1–6 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ochoa, X., Cardinels, K., Meire, M., Duval, E.: Frameworks for the Automatic Indexation of Learning Management Systems Content into Learning Object Repositories. In: Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2005 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 1407–1414 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ochoa, X., Duval, E.: Quality Metrics for Learning Object Metadata. In: Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA 2006 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, AACE, pp. 1004–1011 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sicilia, M.A., García, E., Pagés, C., Martínez, J.J., Gutiérrez, J.: Complete metadata records in learning object repositories: some evidence and requirements. Int. J. of Learning Technology 1(4), 411–424 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M., Shreeves, S., Cole, T.: Metadata quality for federated collections. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Quality, pp. 111–125 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M., Smith, L.: A Framework for Information Quality Assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(12), 1720–1733 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Margaritopoulos, T., Margaritopoulos, M., Mavridis, I., Manitsaris, A. (2009). A Fine-Grained Metric System for the Completeness of Metadata. In: Sartori, F., Sicilia, M.Á., Manouselis, N. (eds) Metadata and Semantic Research. MTSR 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 46. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04590-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04590-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04589-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04590-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics