Skip to main content

What You See Is What You Set – The Position of Moving Objects

  • Conference paper
  • 1570 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5803))

Abstract

Human observers consequently misjudge the position of moving objects towards the direction of motion. This so called flash-lag effect is supposed to be related to very basic processes such as processing latencies in the human brain. In our study we show that this effect can be inversed by changing the task-set of the observer. A top-down change of the observers attentional set leads to a different perception of otherwise identical scenes. Cognitive theories regard the misperception of the moving object as an important feature of attention-mediated processing, because it reflects the prioritized processing of important objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Metzger, W.: Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfindngszeit. Psychologische Forschung 16, 176–200 (1931)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. De Valois, R.L., De Valois, K.K.: Vernier acuity with stationary moving gabors. Vision Res. 31, 1619–1626

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tennis Records and Statistics, http://www.tennis-x.com/stats/tennisrecords.php

  4. Brown, J.M., Breitmeyer, B.G., Leighty, K., Denney, H.I.: The path of visual attention. Acta Psychologica 121, 199–209 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Most, S.B., Simons, D.J., Scholl, B.J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., Chabris, C.F.: How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psych. Sci. 12(1), 9–17 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilis, B., Helsen, W., Weston, M.: Errors in judging “offside“ in association football: test of the optical error versus the perceptual flash-lag hypothesis. Journal of Sport Sci. 24(5), 521–528 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stelmach, L.B., Herdman, C.M.: Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17, 539–550 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scharlau, I.: Perceptual latency priming: A measure of attentional facilitation. Psychological Research 71, 678–686 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., Gibbs, B.J.: The Reviewing of Object Files: Object-Specific Integration of Information. Cognitive Psychology 24, 175–219 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamker, F.: The emergence of attention by population-based inference and its role in disturbed processing and cognitive control of vision. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 100, 64–106 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ansorge, U., Kiss, M., Eimer, M.: Goal-driven attentional capture by invisible colours. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ansorge, U., Neumann, O.: Intentions determine the effects of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cueing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptuin and Performance 31, 762–777 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W., Johnston, J.C.: Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 1030–1044 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Donk, M., van Zoest, W.: Effects of Salience Are Short-Lived. Psych. Sci. 19(7), 733–739 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., Umiltá, C.: Reorienting attention across the horicontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologica 25(1A), 31–40 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Priess, HW., Scharlau, I. (2009). What You See Is What You Set – The Position of Moving Objects. In: Mertsching, B., Hund, M., Aziz, Z. (eds) KI 2009: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5803. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04617-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04617-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04616-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04617-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics