Skip to main content

Revisions of the Split-Attention Effect

  • Conference paper
  • 2566 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5794))

Abstract

For the learning process with multimedia contents the split-attention effect postulates that learning results are better the higher the spatial proximity of text and picture elements is. This article shows that by the use of an artificially generated relationship between texts and pictures which are far away (according to the new principles of grouping by Palmer[1]), it is possible to attain learning results which are at least equal. The negative impact of the spatial distance between text and picture elements can therefore be avoided in a different way. So an online survey has been conducted and the data of 869 subjects have been evaluated regarding to their retention and transfer performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Palmer, S.E.: Vision science: Photons to phenomology. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Paas, F.G.W.C.: Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10, 251–296 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayer, R.E.: Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pp. 31–48. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Sweller, J.: Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pp. 19–30. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Baddeley, A.D.: Human memory: Theory and practice (Rev. ed.). Psychology Press, Hove (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sweller, J.: Evolution of human cognitive architecture. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 43, 215–266 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist 38, 43–52 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ayres, P., Sweller, J.: The split-attention-principle in multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pp. 135–146. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E.: Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology 91, 358–368 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Beck, D.M., Palmer, S.E.: Top-down influences on perceptual grouping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28, 1071–1084 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Palmer, S.E.: Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping. Cognitive Psychology 24, 436–447 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia Learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist 32, 1–19 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ginns, P.: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and the temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction 16, 511–525 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Michas, I.C., Berry, D.C.: Learning a procedural task: Effectiveness of multimedia presentations. Applied Cognitive Psychology 14, 555–575 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bodemer, D., Plötzner, R., Feuerlein, I., Spada, H.: The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualisations. Learning and Instruction 14, 325–341 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mazarakis, A. (2009). Revisions of the Split-Attention Effect. In: Cress, U., Dimitrova, V., Specht, M. (eds) Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines. EC-TEL 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5794. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04636-0_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04636-0_57

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04635-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04636-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics