Skip to main content

Consumer Decision Making in Knowledge-Based Recommendation

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5820))

Abstract

In contrast to customers of bricks and mortar stores, users of online selling environments are not supported by human sales experts. In such situations recommender applications help to identify the products and/or services that fit the user’s wishes and needs. In order to successfully apply recommendation technologies we have to develop an in-depth understanding of decision strategies of users. These decision strategies are explained in different models of human decision making. In this paper we provide an overview of selected models and discuss their importance for recommender system development. Furthermore, we provide an outlook on future research issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Konstan, J., Miller, B., Maltz, D., Herlocker, J., Gordon, L., Riedl, J.: GroupLens: applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news Full text. Communications of the ACM 40(3), 77–87 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pazzani, M., Billsus, D.: Learning and Revising User Profiles: The Identification of Interesting Web Sites. Machine Learning 27, 313–331 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bell, R., Koren, Y.: Improved Neighborhood-based Collaborative Filtering. In: Proceedings of the 1st KDDCup 2007, San Jose, California (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burke, R.: Knowledge-based Recommender Systems. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Systems 69(32), 180–200 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Felfernig, A., Burke, R.: Constraint-based Recommender Systems: Technologies and Research Issues. In: ACM International Conference on Electronic Commerce (ICEC 2008), Innsbruck, Austria, August 19-22 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G., Jannach, D., Stumptner, M.: Consistency-based Diagnosis of Configuration Knowledge Bases. Artificial Intelligence 2(152), 213–234 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsang, E.: Foundations of Constraint Satisfaction. Academic Press, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Payne, J., Bettman, J., Johnson, E.: The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bettman, J., Luce, M., Payne, J.: Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research 25(3), 187–217 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huber, J., Payne, W., Puto, C.: Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research 9, 90–98 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Simonson, I., Tversky, A.: Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research 29, 281–295 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoon, S., Simonson, I.: Choice set configuration as a determinant of preference attribution and strength. Journal of Consumer Research 35, 324–336 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, L., Pu, P.: Trust Building in Recommender Agents. In:1st International Workshop on Web Personalization, Recommender Systems and Intelligent User Interfaces (WPRSIUI 2005), Reading, UK, pp. 135–145 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Teppan, E., Felfernig, A.: The asymmetric dominance effect and its role in e-tourism re-commender applications. In: Proceedings of Wirtschaftsinformatik 2009, Vienna, Austria, pp. 791–800 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roe, R., Busemeyer, J., Townsend, T.: Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review 1, 7–59 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G., Gula, B., Hitz, M., Kruggel, T., Leitner, G., Melcher, R., Riepan, D., Strauss, S., Teppan, E., Vitouch, O.: Persuasive Recommendation: Exploring Serial Position Effects in Knowledge-based Recommender Systems. In: de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 283–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murphy, J., Hofacker, C., Mizerski, R.: Primacy and recency effects on clicking behavior. Journlal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(2), 522–535 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Felfernig, A., Gula, B., Leitner, G., Maier, M., Melcher, R., Teppan, E.: Persuasion in Knowledge-based Recommendation. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 71–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tversky, A., Kahnemann, D.: Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business 59(4), 251–278 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Levin, I., Schneider, S., Gaeth, G.: All Frames are not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Processes 76, 90–98 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huffman, C., Kahn, B.: Variety for sale: Mass Customization or Mass Confusion. Journal of Retailing 74(4), 491–513 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Herrmann, A., Heitmann, M., Polak, B.: The Power of Defaults. Absatzwirtschaft 6, 46–47 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ritov, I., Baron, J.: Status-quo and omission biases. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(2), 49–61 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Samuelson, W., Zeckhauser, R.: Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 108(2), 370–392 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  25. O’Sullivan, B., Papadopoulos, A., Faltings, B., Pu, P.: Representative Explanations for Over-Constrained Problems. In: AAAI 2007, pp. s323–328 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G., Schubert, M., Mandl, M., Mairitsch, M., Teppan, E.: Plausible Repairs for Inconsistent Requirements. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2009), Pasadena, California, USA (2009) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reilly, J., Zhang, J., McGinty, L., Pu, P., Smyth, B.: A comparison of two compound critiquing systems. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2007), Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 3127–3320 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, L., Pu, P.: The Evaluation of a Hybrid Critiquing System with Preference-based Recommendations Organization. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, pp. 169–172 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mandl, M., Felfernig, A., Schubert, M. (2009). Consumer Decision Making in Knowledge-Based Recommendation. In: Liu, J., Wu, J., Yao, Y., Nishida, T. (eds) Active Media Technology. AMT 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5820. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04875-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04875-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04874-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04875-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics