Skip to main content

Analyzing Dangers in Multiagent Rescue Using DEFACTO

  • Conference paper
Safety and Security in Multiagent Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4324))

Abstract

Enabling interactions of agent-teams and humans for safe and effective Multiagent rescue is a critical area of research, with encouraging progress in the past few years. However, previous work suffers from three key limitations: (i) limited human situational awareness, reducing human effectiveness in directing agent teams, (ii) the agent team’s rigid interaction strategies that jeopardize the rescue operation, and (iii) lack of formal tools to analyze the impact of such interaction strategies. This paper presents a software prototype called DEFACTO (Demonstrating Effective Flexible Agent Coordination of Teams through Omnipresence). DEFACTO is based on a software proxy architecture and 3D visualization system, which addresses the three limitations mentioned above. First, the 3D visualization interface enables human virtual omnipresence in the environment, improving human situational awareness and ability to assist agents. Second, generalizing past work on adjustable autonomy, the agent team chooses among a variety of ”team-level” interaction strategies, even excluding humans from the loop in extreme circumstances. Third, analysis tools help predict the dangers of using fixed strategies for various agent teams in a future disaster response simulation scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J.F.: The TRAINS project: A case study in building a conversational planning agent. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical AI (JETAI) 7, 748 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burstein, M.H., Mulvehill, A.M., Deutsch, S.: An approach to mixed-initiative management of heterogeneous software agent teams. In: HICSS, p. 8055. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crandall, J.W., Nielsen, C.W., Goodrich, M.A.: Towards predicting robot team performance. In: SMC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dorais, G., Bonasso, R., Kortenkamp, D., Pell, P., Schreckenghost, D.: Adjustable autonomy for human centered autonomous systems on mars. In: Mars (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fong, T., Thorpe, C., Baur, C.: Multi-robot remote driving with collaborative control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hill, R., Gratch, J., Marsella, S., Rickel, J., Swartout, W., Traum, D.: Virtual humans in the mission rehearsal exercise system. In: KI Embodied Conversational Agents (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horvitz, E.: Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1999), Pittsburgh, PA, May 1999, pp. 159–166 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kitano, H., Tadokoro, S., Noda, I., Matsubara, H., Takahashi, T., Shinjoh, A., Shimada, S.: Robocup rescue: Search and rescue in large-scale disasters as a domain for autonomous agents research. In: IEEE SMC, Tokyo, October 1999, vol. VI, pp. 739–743 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paivio, A.: Pictures and words in visual search. Memory & Cognition 2(3), 515–521 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pynadath, D.V., Tambe, M.: Automated teamwork among heterogeneous software agents and humans. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (JAAMAS) 7, 71–100 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Richardson, A., Montello, D., Hegarty, M.: Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory and Cognition 27(4), 741–750 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruddle, R., Payne, S., Jones, D.: Navigating buildings in desktop virtual environments: Experimental investigations using extended navigational experience. J. Experimental Psychology - Applied 3(2), 143–159 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scerri, P., Pynadath, D., Tambe, M.: Towards adjustable autonomy for the real world. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 17, 171–228 (2002)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Scerri, P., Pynadath, D.V., Johnson, L., Rosenbloom, P., Schurr, N., Si, M., Tambe, M.: A prototype infrastructure for distributed robot-agent-person teams. In: AAMAS (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Neumann, U., You, S., Hu, J., Fox, P.: Urban site modeling from lidar. In: Proc. 2nd Intl Workshop Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling (CGGM), pp. 579–588 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marecki, J., Schurr, N., Tambe, M., Scerri, P. (2009). Analyzing Dangers in Multiagent Rescue Using DEFACTO. In: Barley, M., Mouratidis, H., Unruh, A., Spears, D., Scerri, P., Massacci, F. (eds) Safety and Security in Multiagent Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4324. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04879-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04879-1_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04878-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04879-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics