Skip to main content

Comparability of Statistics

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Comparison is the cognitive function that is basis for any measuring process and a frequent activity in everyday human life. Nowadays, comparisons of statistics over time and, even more demanding, cross-national and multilateral comparisons are a central element of economic and social analyzes. For politics and administration, for business and media, and for each citizen, comparisons are means to understand and assess the political, economic, and social processes of this world. This situation raises questions: Under which conditions are statistics comparable? Under which conditions is a comparison valid and leads to reliable results? What conclusions may be drawn and what are the risks implied by such conclusions?

Comparability: Definition and Assessment

Rathsmann-Sponsel and Sponsel (2001) describe “comparison” as a 7-digit relation f(P, S, Z, K, V, A, B); P represents the comparing person, S and Z describe the comparing situation and the purpose of comparison, respectively; vector K...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,100.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References and Further Reading

  • European Commission (2005) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council on the independence, integrity and accountability of the national and Community statistical authorities, Recommendation on the independence, integrity and accountability of the national and Community statistical authorities, COM (2005) 217

    Google Scholar 

  • European Statistics Code of Practice (2005) http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/quality/documents/code_ practice.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2009) ESS handbook for quality reports. European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouhette S, Sproge L (2005) Quality profiles for structural indicators EU LFS based indicators. In: 29th CEIES seminar, Expert meeting statistics “Structural indicators”, Luxembourg, European Communities, pp 107–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathsmann-Sponsel I, Sponsel R (2001) Allgemeine Theorie und Praxis des Vergleichens und der Vergleichbarkeit. Internet Publikation fr allgemeine und integrative Psychotherapie, http://www.sgipt.org/wisms/verglbk0.htm

  • Nederpelt V, Peter WM (2009) Checklist quality of statistical output. Statistics Netherlands, Den Haag/Heerlen

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hackl, P. (2011). Comparability of Statistics. In: Lovric, M. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics