Skip to main content

Browsing Recommendation Based on the Intertemporal Choice Model

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5822))

Abstract

Browsing is an important but often inefficient information seeking strategy in information retrieval (IR). In this paper, we argue that an effective recommendation model can improve the user’s browsing experience. We propose to adapt the intertemporal choice model to model the browsing behaviour of the user. The model can be used to recommend a browsing path to the users. The proposed model is based on the assumption that the browsing recommendation problem is an intertemporal choice problem. Using a simulated interactive retrieval system on several standard TREC test collections, the experimental results show that the proposed model is promising in recommending good browsing paths to the user.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Olston, C., Chi, E.H.: ScentTrails: Integrating Browsing and Searching on the Web. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 10(3), 177–197 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vinay, V., Cox, I.J., Milic-Frayling, N., Wood, K.: Evaluating Relevance Feedback Algorithms for Searching on Small Displays. In: Losada, D.E., Fernández-Luna, J.M. (eds.) ECIR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3408, pp. 185–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pirolli, P., Card, S.K.: Information Foraging. Psychological Review 106(4), 643–675 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Read, D.: Intertemporal choice. In: Koehler, D., Harvey, N. (eds.) Blackwell Handbook of Judgement and Decision Making, pp. 424–443. Blackwell, Oxford (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellis, D.: A behavioral approach to information retrieval system design. Journal of Documentation 45(3), 171–212 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bates, M.J.: The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review 13, 407–424 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chi, E.H., et al.: Using information scent to model user information needs and actions and the Web. In: CHI 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell, I.: Interactive evaluation of the Ostensive Model using a new test collection of images with multiple relevance assessment. Information Retrieval 2(1), 87–114 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirashima, T., et al.: Context-sensitive filtering for browsing in hypertext. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pp. 119–126. ACM Press, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gery, M.: Non-linear reading for a structured web indexation. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pp. 379–380. ACM Press, Tampere (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Mobasher, B., et al.: Discovery and Evaluation of Aggregate Usage Profiles for Web Personalization. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 6(1), 61–82 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Perkowitz, M., Etzioni, O.: Towards adaptive Web sites: Conceptual framework and case study. Artificial Intelligent 118, 245–275 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Wexelblat, A., Maes, P.: Footprints: History-rich web browsing. In: Computer-Assisted Information Retrieval, RIAO (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huberman, B.A., et al.: Strong Regularities in World Wide Web Surfing. Science 280, 95–97 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Information Retrieval, 2nd edn. Butterworth & Co Ltd., London (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T.: Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature 40(2), 351–401 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Loewenstein, G.F., Prelec, D.: Preferences for sequences of outcomes. Psychological Review 100(1), 91–108 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Samuelson, P.A.: A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies 4(2), 155–161 (1937)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Azman, A.: Measuring the Effectiveness of a Search Algorithm for Mobile Devices. In: Prosiding Capaian Maklumat & Pengurusan Pengetahuan, CAMP 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. White, R.W., et al.: Evaluating implicit feedback models using searcher simulations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 23(3), 325–361 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ounis, I., et al.: Terrier Information Retrieval Platform. In: Losada, D.E., Fernández-Luna, J.M. (eds.) ECIR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3408, pp. 517–519. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Harman, D.: Overview of the first TREC conference. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM SIGIR Conference of Research and Development in Information Retrieval (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Azman, A.: Intertemporal Choice for Browsing in Information Retrieval. In: Department of Computing Science, p. 160. University of Glasgow, Glasgow (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Azman, A., Ounis, I. (2009). Browsing Recommendation Based on the Intertemporal Choice Model. In: Andreasen, T., Yager, R.R., Bulskov, H., Christiansen, H., Larsen, H.L. (eds) Flexible Query Answering Systems. FQAS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5822. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04957-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04957-6_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04956-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04957-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics