Skip to main content

Content-Oriented Relevance Feedback in XML-IR Using the Garnata Information Retrieval System

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5822))

Abstract

Relevance Feedback (RF) is a technique allowing to enrich an initial query according to the user feedback in order to get results closer to the user’s information need. This paper presents a new RF method for keyword queries (content queries). It is based on the re-weighting of the original query terms plus the addition of new query terms from the content of elements jugded as relevant or non-relevant by the user. This RF method is integrated in our search engine, Garnata, and evaluated with the INEX 2007 collection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balmin, A., et al.: A system for keyword proximity search on XML databases. In: VLDB 2003, pp. 1069–1072 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guo, L., et al.: XRANK: ranked keyword search over XML documents. In: SIGMOD 2003, pp. 16–27 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xu, Y., Papakonstantinou, Y.: Efficient keyword search for smallest LCAs in XML databases. In: SIGMOD 2005, pp. 537–538 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Campos, L., Fernández-Luna, J.M., Huete, J., Romero, A.: Garnata: An information retrieval system for structured documents based on probabilistic graphical models. In: Proceedings of the IMPU 2006 conference, pp. 1024–1031 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kazai, G., et al.: The INEX evaluation initiative. In: Blanken, et al. (eds.), pp. 279–293.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rocchio Jr., J.: Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In: Salton, G. (ed.) The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, ch. 14, pp. 313–323. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kamps, J., Pehcevski, J., Kazai, G., Lalmas, M., Robertson, S.: INEX 2007 evaluation measures. In: Fuhr, N., Kamps, J., Lalmas, M., Trotman, A. (eds.) INEX 2007. LNCS, vol. 4862, pp. 24–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruthven, I., Lalmas, M.: A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems. Knowledge Engineering Review 18(1) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crouch, C.J., Mahajan, A., Bellamkonda, A.: Flexible XML retrieval based on the extended vector model. In: Fuhr, N., Lalmas, M., Malik, S., Szlávik, Z. (eds.) INEX 2004. LNCS, vol. 3493, pp. 292–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mass, Y., Mandelbrod, M.: Relevance feedback for XML retrieval. In: INEX 2004 Workshop, pp. 154–157 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sigurbjörnsson, B., Kamps, J., de Rijke, M.: The University of Amsterdam at INEX 2004. In: INEX 2004 Workshop, pp. 104–109 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pan, H., Theobald, A., Schenkel, R.: Query refinement by relevance feedback in an XML retrieval system. In: Atzeni, P., Chu, W., Lu, H., Zhou, S., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2004. LNCS, vol. 3288, pp. 854–855. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. de Campos, L.M., Fernández-Luna, J.M., Huete, J.F.: Using context information in structured document retrieval: An approach using Influence Diagrams. IP&M 40(5), 829–847 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen, F.V.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Shachter, R.D.: Probabilistic inference and influence diagrams. Oper. Res. 36(4), 589–604 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. de Campos, L.M., Fernández-Luna, J.M., Huete, J.F.: Improving the context-based influence diagram for structured retrieval. In: Losada, D.E., Fernández-Luna, J.M. (eds.) ECIR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3408, pp. 215–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robertson, S., Sparck-Jones, K.: Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society of Information Science 27, 129–146 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Denoyer, L., Gallinari, P.: The Wikipedia XML corpus. SIGIR Forum 40, 64–69 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Campos, L.M., Fernández-Luna, J.M., Huete, J.F., Martín-Dancausa, C. (2009). Content-Oriented Relevance Feedback in XML-IR Using the Garnata Information Retrieval System. In: Andreasen, T., Yager, R.R., Bulskov, H., Christiansen, H., Larsen, H.L. (eds) Flexible Query Answering Systems. FQAS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5822. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04957-6_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04957-6_53

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04956-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04957-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics