Skip to main content

Hard QBF Encodings Made Easy: Dream or Reality?

  • Conference paper
Book cover AI*IA 2009: Emergent Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5883))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 797 Accesses

Abstract

In a recent work we have shown that quantified treewidth is an effective empirical hardness marker for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs), and that a preprocessor geared towards decreasing quantified treewidth is a potential enabler for the solution of hard QBF encodings.

In this paper we improve on previously introduced preprocessing techniques, and we broaden our experimental analysis to consider other structural parameters and other state-of-the-art preprocessors for QBFs. Our aim is to understand – in light of the parameters that we consider – whether manipulating a formula can make it easier, and under which conditions this is more likely to happen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mneimneh, M., Sakallah, K.: Computing vertex eccentricity in exponentially large graphs: QBF formulation and solution. In: Giunchiglia, E., Tacchella, A. (eds.) SAT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2919, pp. 411–425. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ansotegui, C., Gomes, C.P., Selman, B.: Achille’s heel of QBF. In: Proc. of AAAI (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peschiera, C., Pulina, L., Tacchella, A.: QBF comparative evaluation (2008), http://www.qbfeval.org/2008

  4. Pulina, L., Tacchella, A.: Treewidth: A useful marker of empirical hardness in quantified boolean logic encodings. In: Cervesato, I., Veith, H., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5330, pp. 528–542. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, H., Dalmau, V.: From Pebble Games to Tractability: An Ambidextrous Consistency Algorithm for Quantified Constraint Satisfaction. In: Ong, L. (ed.) CSL 2005. LNCS, vol. 3634, pp. 232–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan, G., Vardi, M.Y.: Optimizing a BDD-based modal solver. In: Baader, F. (ed.) CADE 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2741, pp. 75–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giunchiglia, E., Narizzano, M., Tacchella, A.: Clause-Term Resolution and Learning in Quantified Boolean Logic Satisfiability. Artificial Intelligence Research 26, 371–416 (2006)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnborg, S., Corneil, D.G., Proskurowski, A.: Complexity of finding embeddings in a k-tree. SIAM Journal on Algebraic and Discrete Methods, 277–284 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Giunchiglia, E., Narizzano, M., Pulina, L., Tacchella, A.: Quantified Boolean Formulas satisfiability library, QBFLIB (2001), http://www.qbflib.org

  10. Benedetti, M.: Quantifier Trees for QBFs. In: Bacchus, F., Walsh, T. (eds.) SAT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3569, pp. 378–385. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Giunchiglia, E., Narizzano, M., Tacchella, A.: Quantifier Structure in search based procedures for QBFs. IEEE TCAD 26(3) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pulina, L., Tacchella, A.: MIND-Lab projects and related information (2008), http://www.mind-lab.it/projects

  13. Kleine-Büning, H., Karpinski, M., Flögel, A.: Resolution for Quantified Boolean Formulas. Information and Computation 117(1), 12–18 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Rish, I., Dechter, R.: Resolution versus search: Two strategies for sat. Journal of Automated Reasoning 24(1/2), 225–275 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Samulowitz, H., Davies, J., Bacchus, F.: Preprocessing QBF. In: Benhamou, F. (ed.) CP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4204, pp. 514–529. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Bubeck, U., Büning, H.K.: Bounded Universal Expansion for Preprocessing QBF. In: Marques-Silva, J., Sakallah, K.A. (eds.) SAT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4501, pp. 244–257. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walsh, T.: Search in a Small World. In: Proc. of IJCAI (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pulina, L., Tacchella, A. (2009). Hard QBF Encodings Made Easy: Dream or Reality?. In: Serra, R., Cucchiara, R. (eds) AI*IA 2009: Emergent Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence. AI*IA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5883. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10291-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10291-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10290-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10291-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics