Skip to main content

Simple Default Reasoning in Theories of Action

  • Conference paper
  • 1589 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5866))

Abstract

We extend a recent approach to integrate action formalisms and non-monotonic reasoning. The resulting framework allows an agent employing an action theory as internal world model to make useful default assumptions. While the previous approach only allowed for modeling static defaults, that are independent of state properties, our extension allows for the expression of dynamic defaults. Problems that arise due to the interaction of defaults with the solution of the frame problem are dealt with accordingly: we devise a general method of integrating defaults into the formal representation of action effects and show that the method prevents counter-intuitive conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Strass, H., Thielscher, M.: On Defaults in Action Theories. In: Mertsching, B., Hund, M., Aziz, Z. (eds.) KI 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5803, pp. 298–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reiter, R.: A Logic for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13, 81–132 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Reiter, R.: The Frame Problem in the Situation Calculus: A Simple Solution (Sometimes) and a Completeness Result for Goal Regression. In: Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Theory of Computation – Papers in Honor of John McCarthy, pp. 359–380. Academic Press, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thielscher, M.: From Situation Calculus to Fluent Calculus: State Update Axioms as a Solution to the Inferential Frame Problem. Artificial Intelligence 111(1-2), 277–299 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Thielscher, M.: A Unifying Action Calculus. Artificial Intelligence (to appear, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCarthy, J.: Situations and Actions and Causal Laws, Stanford Artificial Intelligence Project: Memo 2 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kowalski, R.A., Sergot, M.J.: A Logic-based Calculus of Events. New Generation Computing 4(1), 67–95 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pirri, F., Reiter, R.: Some Contributions to the Metatheory of the Situation Calculus. Journal of the ACM 46(3), 325–361 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandewall, E.: Features and Fluents: The Representation of Knowledge about Dynamical Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Strass, H., Thielscher, M. (2009). Simple Default Reasoning in Theories of Action. In: Nicholson, A., Li, X. (eds) AI 2009: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5866. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10439-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10439-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10438-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10439-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics