Skip to main content

About Classification Methods Based on Tensor Modelling for Hyperspectral Images

  • Conference paper
  • 1421 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 61))

Abstract

Denoising and Dimensionality reduction (DR) are key issue to improve the classifiers efficiency for Hyperspectral images (HSI). The multi-way Wiener filtering recently developed is used, Principal and independent component analysis (PCA, ICA) and projection pursuit (PP) approaches to DR have been investigated. These matrix algebra methods are applied on vectorized images. Thereof, the spatial rearrangement is lost. To jointly take advantage of the spatial and spectral information, HSI has been recently represented as tensor. Offering multiple ways to decompose data orthogonally, we introduced filtering and DR methods based on multilinear algebra tools. The DR is performed on spectral way using PCA, or PP joint to an orthogonal projection onto a lower subspace dimension of the spatial ways. We show the classification improvement using the introduced methods in function to existing methods. This experiment is exemplified using real-world HYDICE data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Muti, D., Bourennane, S.: Survey on tensor signal algebraic filtering. Signal Proceesing Journal 87, 237–249 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Landgrebe, D.: Hyperspectral image data analysis as a high dimensional signal processing problem. IEEE Signal Process. Magazine 19(1), 17–28 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, J., Chang, C.: Independent component analysis - based dimensionality reduction with applications in hyperspectral image analysis. IEEE Trans. on Geosc. and Remote Sens. 44(6), 1586–1588 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ifarraguerri, A., Chang, C.-I.: Unsupervised hyperspectral image analysis with projection pursuit. IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38(6), 2529–2538 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones, M.C., Sibson, R.: What is projection pursuit. J.R. Statist. Soc. A 150(1), 1–36 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman, J., Tuckey, J.: A projection pursuit algorithm for exploratory data analysis. IEEE Transactionson Computers 23(9), 881–889 (1974)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Jimenez, L., Landgrebe, D.: Hyperspectral data analysis and supervised feature reduction via projection pursuit. IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 37(6), 2653–2667 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jimenez-Rodriguez, L., Arzuaga-Cruz, E., Velez-Reyes, M.: Unsupervised linear feature-extraction methods and their effects in the classification of high-dimensional data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 45(2), 469–483 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Renard, N., Bourennane, S.: Improvement of target detection methods by multiway filtering. IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 46(8), 2407–2417 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Renard, N., Bourennane, S., Blanc-Talon, J.: Denoising and dimensionality reduction using multilinear tools for hyperspectral images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 5(2), 138–142 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Letexier, D., Bourennane, S., Blanc-Talon, J.: Nonorthogonal tensor matricization for hyperspectral image filtering. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 5(1), 3–7 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tucker, L.: Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 31, 279–311, 66

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kolda, T.: Orthogonal tensor decomposition. SIAM Joural on Matrix Analysis and Applications 23(1), 243–255 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Harshman, R., Lundy, M.: Research methods for multilmode data analysis. In: Law, H., Snyder, J., Hattie, J., McDonald, R. (eds.), vol. 70, pp. 122–215. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tucker, L.: The extension of factor analysis to three-dimensional matrices, pp. 109–127. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, NY (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Lathauwer, L., De Moor, B., Vandewalle, J.: A multilinear singular value decomposition. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 21, 1253–1278 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. De Lathauwer, L., De Moor, B., Vandewalle, J.: On the best rank-(r 1,...,r N ) approximation of higher-order tensors. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 21, 1324–1342 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Comon, P.: Independent component analysis: A new concept. Signal Process. 36, 287–314 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Hyvarinen, A., Karhunen, J., Oja, E.: Independent Component Analysis. John Wiley Sons, Chichester (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang, C., Chiang, S., Smith, J., Ginsberg, I.: Linear spectrum random mixture analysis for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 40(2), 375–392 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sidiropoulos, N., Giannakis, G., Bro, R.: Blind parafac receivers for DS-CDMA systems. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing 48(3), 810–823 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hazan, T., Polak, S., Shashua, A.: Sparse image coding using a 3d non-negative tensor factorization. In: Computer Vision, IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Beijing, China, October 2005, vol. 4179(1), pp. 50–57 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vasilescu, M., Terzopoulos, D.: Multilinear independent components analysis. In: Proc. of IEEE CVPR 2005, vol. 1, pp. 547–553 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Basedow, R., Aldrich, W., Colwell, J., Kinder, W.: Hydice system performance - an update. In: SPIE Proc., Denver, CO, August 1996, vol. 2821, pp. 76–84 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bourennane, S., Fossati, C. (2009). About Classification Methods Based on Tensor Modelling for Hyperspectral Images. In: Ślęzak, D., Pal, S.K., Kang, BH., Gu, J., Kuroda, H., Kim, Th. (eds) Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition. SIP 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 61. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10546-3_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10546-3_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10545-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10546-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics