Skip to main content

Yet Another Metric for Predicting Fault-Prone Modules

  • Conference paper
Advances in Software Engineering (ASEA 2009)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 59))

Abstract

Recently, machine learning approaches have been widely used for fault-proneness detection. Introduction of machine learning approaches induces development of new software metrics for fault-prone module detection. We have proposed an approach to detect fault-prone modules using the spam-filtering technique. To treat our approach as the conventional fault-prone approaches, we summarize the output of spam-filtering based approach as a metric. In this paper, we show the effectiveness of our new metric comparing the conventional software metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Briand, L.C., Melo, W.L., Wust, J.: Assessing the applicability of fault-proneness models across object-oriented software projects. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 28(7), 706–720 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Seliya, N.: Comparative assessment of software quality classification techniques: An empirical study. Empirical Software Engineering 9, 229–257 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bellini, P., Bruno, I., Nesi, P., Rogai, D.: Comparing fault-proneness estimation models. In: Proc. of 10th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, pp. 205–214 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Menzies, T., Greenwald, J., Frank, A.: Data mining static code attributes to learn defect predictors. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 33(1), 2–13 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Catal, C., Diri, B.: Review: A systematic review of software fault prediction studies. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(4), 7346–7354 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Layman, L., Kudrjavets, G., Nagappan, N.: Iterative identification of fault-prone binaries using in-process metrics. In: Proc. of 2nd International Conference on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 206–212 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, S., Pan, K., Whitehead Jr., E.J.: Memories of bug fixes. In: Proc. of 14th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 35–45 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mizuno, O., Kikuno, T.: Training on errors experiment to detect fault-prone software modules by spam filter. In: Proc. of 6th joint meeting of the European software engineering conference and the ACM SIGSOFT symposium on the foundations of software engineering, pp. 405–414 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mizuno, O., Kikuno, T.: Prediction of fault-prone software modules using a generic text discriminator. IEICE Trans. on Information and Systems E91-D(4) , 888–896 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 20(6), 476–493 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Basili, V.R., Briand, L.C., Melo, W.L.: A validation of object oriented metrics as quality indicators. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 22(10), 751–761 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gyimóthy, T., Ferenc, R., Siket, I.: Empirical validation of object-oriented metrics on open source software for fault prediction. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 31(10), 897–910 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miyake, T., Higo, Y., Inoue, K.: Masu: Metrics assessment plugin-plutform for software unit of multiple programming languages. In: Proc. of Software Engineering Symposium 2008, pp. 63–70 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Śliwerski, J., Zimmermann, T., Zeller, A.: When do changes induce fixes (on Fridays). In: Proc. of 2nd International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, pp. 24–28 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, S., Zimmermann, T., Pan, K., Whitehead Jr., E.J.: Automatic identification of bug-introducing changes. In: Proc. of 21st International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 81–90 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mizuno, O., Hata, H. (2009). Yet Another Metric for Predicting Fault-Prone Modules. In: Ślęzak, D., Kim, Th., Kiumi, A., Jiang, T., Verner, J., Abrahão, S. (eds) Advances in Software Engineering. ASEA 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 59. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10619-4_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10619-4_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10618-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10619-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics