Skip to main content

On Using Network Tomography for Overlay Availability

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5935))

Abstract

Overlay networks are logical abstraction on a physical network (underlay) where each overlay node corresponds to a specific underlay node and overlay links correspond to paths on the underlay. The use of network layer information for constructing overlay networks can greatly improve their performance. Knowledge of underlay properties such as available bandwidths, loss rates and topology can help in efficient construction, maintenance and optimization of overlays which have to provide service guarantees. In absence of any support from the network core, it becomes necessary to infer those properties by performing end-to-end measurements on the network. We develop probing techniques which infer information about the structure of the underlay and use it for construction of fault-tolerant overlay networks. Algorithms and measurement techniques for the same are presented together with the experimental findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cui, W., Stoica, I., Katz, R.: Backup path allocation based on a correlated link failure probability model in overlay networks. In: Proceedings of 10th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, 2002, pp. 236–245 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ratnasamy, S., Handley, M., Karp, R., Shenker, S.: Topologically-aware overlay construction and server selection. In: INFOCOM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Han, J., Watson, D., Jahanian, F.: Topology aware overlay networks. IEEE INFOCOM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, L., Griffioen, J., Calvert, K., Shi, S.: Passive inference of path correlation. In: Proceedings of the 14th international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video, pp. 36–41 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mills, D.: Internet Time Synchronization: The Network Time Protocol. In: Yang, Z., Anthony Marsland, T. (eds.) Global States and Time in Distributed Systems. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bolot, J.: End-to-end packet delay and loss behavior in the internet. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 23, 289–298 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter, R., Crovella, M.: Measuring bottleneck link speed in packet-switched networks. Performance evaluation 27, 297–318 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lai, K., Baker, M.: Measuring link bandwidths using a deterministic model of packet delay. SIGCOMM, 283–294 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mah, B.: Estimating bandwidth and other network properties. Internet Statistics and Metrics Analysis (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harfoush, K., Bestavros, A., Byers, J.: Measuring bottleneck bandwidth of targeted path segments. In: INFOCOM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fei, T., Tao, S., Gao, L., Guerin, R.: How to select a good alternate path in large peer-to-peer systems. IEEE INFOCOM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Andersen, D., Balakrishnan, H., Kaashoek, F., Morris, R.: Resilient overlay networks. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Andersen, D.G., Snoeren, A.C., Balakrishnan, H.: Best-path vs. multi-path overlay routing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. ACM, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coates, M., Castro, R., Nowak, R., Gadhiok, M., King, R., Tsang, Y.: Maximum likelihood network topology identification from edge-based unicast measurements. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems, pp. 11–20 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, Y., Bindel, D., Song, H., Katz, R.: An algebraic approach to practical and scalable overlay network monitoring. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 34, 55–66 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Patidar, M.: Constructing underlay-aware fault tolerant overlay networks. In: Dual Degree Dissertation Department of Computer Science And Engineering IIT Bombay (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bellur, U., Patidar, M. (2010). On Using Network Tomography for Overlay Availability. In: Kant, K., Pemmaraju, S.V., Sivalingam, K.M., Wu, J. (eds) Distributed Computing and Networking. ICDCN 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5935. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11322-2_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11322-2_46

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11321-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11322-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics