Skip to main content

Adapting Dynamic Logistics Processes and Networks: Advantages Through Regional Logistics Clusters

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

In order to show how logistics clusters can bring time advantages in adapting dynamic logistics processes and networks to the involved companies, in this paper the approaches of the Porter diamond, in which the national competitive advantages are being deduced and transferred to the regional level, are combined with the bases of the logistics system by Pfohl in one model. It is shown, how the force of assimilation and the increased adaptability of the companies in the cluster lead to a cluster arbitrage over time. The developed model is practically analyzed by the example of the logistics cluster in Bremen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Often industrial districts (see Markusen (1996) and Marshall (1920)), industry cluster (see Cortright (2005), p. 8), Innovative Milieus (see Franz (1999), p. 112), hot spots (see Pouder/St. John (1996), p. 1194), sticky places, regional innovation networks and hub-and-spoke-districts (see Markusen (1996), p. 296) are used synonymously.

  2. 2.

    See Porter (1990).

  3. 3.

    See Elbert/Schönberger/Tschischke (2009), pp. 61–67.

  4. 4.

    See Haasis/Elbert (2008), p. 22.

  5. 5.

    Porter (1998), pp. 197–198.

  6. 6.

    See Marshall (1920); Becattini (1990) and Piore/Sabel (1985).

  7. 7.

    See Markusen (1996) and Pauder/St. John (1996).

  8. 8.

    See Porter (2003), pp. 562–571 and Porter (1998), pp. 213–225.

  9. 9.

    See Porter (1998), pp. 213–214.

  10. 10.

    See e.g. Sölvell/Lindqvist/Ketels (2003); Rosenfeld (1997); Porter (1998); Roelandt/den Hertog (1999) and Porter (2003).

  11. 11.

    Porter (1990).

  12. 12.

    See Porter (1990), p. 216.

  13. 13.

    See Elbert/Schönberger/Müller (2008), p. 315.

  14. 14.

    See Elbert/Schönberger/Müller (2008), p. 316.

  15. 15.

    See Pfohl (2004a), pp. 14–20.

  16. 16.

    See Pfohl (2004b), p. 27.

  17. 17.

    E.g. production-managerial, logistics-technological and -institutional as well as demand-oriented conditions for the logistics process.

  18. 18.

    E.g. existing organization, existing manufacturing plants, business size and the company’s policy.

  19. 19.

    See Elbert/Schönberger/Müller (2008), pp. 315–316.

  20. 20.

    See Elbert/Schönberger/Müller (2008), pp. 315–316.

  21. 21.

    See amongst others e.g. Giddens (1984), Rosenfeld (1997).

  22. 22.

    See Rosenfeld (1997), p. 8–10. Rosenfeld argues that the “flow of information, technological advances, innovations, skills, people, and capital into, out of, and within the cluster, from point to point” are for achieving the cluster’s economies equally important as are scale or critical mass. Following this, he defines clusters as “a geographically bounded concentration of interdependent business with active channels for business transactions, dialogue, and communications, […] that collectively shares common opportunities and threats”.

  23. 23.

    See Sydow et al. (2007), p. 5.

  24. 24.

    See Kompetenzzentrum Logistik Bremen (2009): Logistikstandort Bremen, Bremerhaven und die Nordwest-Region: http://www.klb-bremen.de.

  25. 25.

    Cluster also could be described as meso-logistics; see amongst others Haasis (2008); Haasis (2007), pp. 98–107; Haasis/Fischer ((2007)).

  26. 26.

    See Haasis (2008); Haasis/Fischer (2007).

  27. 27.

    See DAV (1992), p. 4.

  28. 28.

    See Scope and objectives of the Kieserling Stiftung, in: http://www.kieserling-stiftung.de.

References

  • Becattini, G. (1990): The Marshallian industrial districts as a socio-economic notion. In: Pyke, F./Becattini, G./Sengenberger, W. (Eds.): Industrial districts and interfirm co-operation in Italy. Genf 1990, pp. 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortright, J. (2005): Making Sense of Clusters: Regional Competitiveness and Economic Development. Available on: http://www.brook.edu/metro/pubs/20060313_Clusters.pdf. Last visit June 18th 2009.

  • Deutsche Aussenhandels- und Verkehrs-Akademie (1992): Konzeptstudie Logistik Zentrum Bremen, Bremen 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbert, R./Schönberger, R./Müller, F. (2008): Regionale Gestaltungsfelder für robuste und sichere globale Logistiksysteme. Strategien zur Vermeidung, Reduzierung und Beherrschung von Risiken durch Logistik-Cluster. In: Pfohl, H.-Chr./Wimmer, T. (Eds.): Wissenschaft und Praxis im Dialog. Robuste und sichere Logistiksysteme. Hamburg 2008, pp. 294–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbert, R./Schönberger, R./Tschischke, T. (2009): Wettbewerbsvorteile durch Logistik-Cluster. In: Wolf-Kluthausen, H. (Hrsg.): Jahrbuch Logistik 2009. Korschenbroich 2009, pp. 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, P. (1999): Innovative Milieus: Extrempunkte der Interpenetration von Wirtschafts- und Wissenschaftssystem. In: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 19(1999) 2, pp. 107–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984): The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haasis, H.-D. (2007): Mesologistik: Leistungsoptimierung in der maritimen Logistikregion Nord-West-Deutschland. In: Kieserling Stiftung (Ed.): Quo vadis Netzwerk – Evolution der Logistik. Bremen, 2007, pp. 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haasis, H.-D. (2008): Produktions- und Logistikmanagement. Wiesbaden 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haasis, H.-D./Fischer, H. (Eds.) (2007): Kooperationsmanagement. Eschborn 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haasis, H.-D.: Elbert, R. (2008): Bringing regional networks back-into global supply chains: Strategies for logistics service providers as integrators of logistics clusters, in: Kersten, W./Blecker, T./Flämming, H. (Eds.): Global Logistics Management, Berlin 2008, pp. 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISL – Institut für Seeverkehrswirtschaft und Logistik (Ed.) (2004): Bremen – die Logistik Company. Ergebnisse einer Konkretisierung. Bremen 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (1996): Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. In: Economic Geography 72(1996)3, pp. 293–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920): Principles of Economics. London, Basingstoke 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouder, R./St. John, C.H. (1996): Hot Spots and Blind Spots: Geographical Clusters of Firms and Innovation. In: Academy of Management Review, 21(1996)4, pp. 1192–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, H.-Chr. (2004a): Logistiksysteme. Betriebswirtschaftliche Grundlagen. 7., korrigierte und aktualisierte Auflage. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfohl, H.-Chr. (2004b): Logistikmanagement. Konzeption und Funktionen. 2., vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M.J./Sabel, C.F. (1985): Das Ende der Massenproduktion. Berlin 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1990): The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London, Basingstoke 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1998): On Competition. Boston 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (2003): The Economic Performance of Regions. In: Regional Studies, 37(2003)6/7, pp. 549–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelandt, T.J.A./den Hertog, P. (1999): Cluster Analysis and Cluster-Based Policy Making in OECD Countries: An Introduction to the Theme, Ch 1. In: OECD (Eds.): Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach. Paris 1999, pp. 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, S. A. (1997): Bringing Business Clusters into the Mainstream of Economic Development. In: European Planning Studies, 5(1997)1, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sölvell, Ö./Lindqvist, G./Ketels, C. (2003): The Cluster Initiative Greenbook. Stockholm 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J./Lerch, F./Huxham, C./Hibbert, P. (2007): Developing Photonics Clusters. Commonalities, Contrasts and Contradictions. Advanced Institute of Management Research. London 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Schönberger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer -Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Elbert, R., Haasis, HD., Schönberger, R., Landwehr, T. (2011). Adapting Dynamic Logistics Processes and Networks: Advantages Through Regional Logistics Clusters. In: Kreowski, HJ., Scholz-Reiter, B., Thoben, KD. (eds) Dynamics in Logistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11996-5_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11996-5_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11995-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11996-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics