Skip to main content

Revising the UML Collaborations: A Well-Founded Approach

  • Conference paper
Foundations of Computer Software. Future Trends and Techniques for Development (Monterey Workshop 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6028))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 518 Accesses

Abstract

We first argue that in some software development areas the need emerges of modelling structural and behavioural aspects of a community of objects cooperating to achieve a specific purpose, say a cooperation, for short. The notion of cooperation is formalized, with a first citizenship status, in the UML 2, as a collaboration. There are however some unclear and problematic spots both on some syntactic and semantic aspects of the UML collaboration. The main goal of this paper is to present first a much simplified metamodel for defining a collaboration, still producing the same notation, with an associated semantics. Rather surprisingly different useful semantic interpretations may be given and are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. OMG: Service oriented architecture Modeling Language (SoaML) - Specification for the UML Profile and Metamodel for Services, UPMS (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Astesiano, E., Reggio, G., Ricca, F.: Modeling Business within a UML-Based Rigorous Software Development Approach. In: Degano, P., De Nicola, R., Meseguer, J. (eds.) Concurrency, Graphs and Models. LNCS, vol. 5065, pp. 261–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. UML Revision Task Force: OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Superstructure, V2.1.2 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G.: The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, 2nd edn. The Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, 2nd edn. The Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Astesiano, E., Reggio, G., Cerioli, M.: From Formal Techniques to Well-Founded Software Development Methods. In: Aichernig, B.K., Maibaum, T. (eds.) Formal Methods at the Crossroads. From Panacea to Foundational Support. LNCS, vol. 2757, pp. 132–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer, B.: Object-Oriented Software Construction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, C.: Some Mistakes I Have Made and What I Have Learned FromThem. In: Astesiano, E. (ed.) ETAPS 1998 and FASE 1998. LNCS, vol. 1382, p. 7. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Engels, G., Hausmann, J., Heckel, R., Sauer, S.: Dynamic meta modeling: A graphical approach to the operational semantics of behavioral diagrams in UML. In: Evans, A., Kent, S., Selic, B. (eds.) UML 2000. LNCS, vol. 1939, pp. 323–337. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Broy, M., Crane, M.L., Dingel, J., Hartman, A., Rumpe, B., Selic, B.: 2nd UML 2 semantics symposium: Formal semantics for UML. In: Kühne, T. (ed.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4364, pp. 318–323. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Cengarle, M., Knapp, A., Tarlecki, A., Wirsing, M.: A heterogeneous approach to UML semantics. In: Degano, P., De Nicola, R., Meseguer, J. (eds.) Concurrency, Graphs and Models. LNCS, vol. 5065, pp. 383–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Astesiano, E., Reggio, G.: Towards a well-founded UML-based development method. In: SEFM 2003. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Astesiano, E., Reggio, G.: Tight Structuring for Precise UML-based Requirement Specifications. In: Wirsing, M., Knapp, A., Balsamo, S. (eds.) RISSEF 2002. LNCS, vol. 2941, pp. 16–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reggio, G., Astesiano, E., Choppy, C., Hussmann, H.: Analysing UML Active Classes and Associated State Machines – A Lightweight Formal Approach. In: Maibaum, T. (ed.) FASE 2000. LNCS, vol. 1783, p. 127. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Reggio, G., Cerioli, M., Astesiano, E.: Towards a Rigorous Semantics of UML Supporting its Multiview Approach. In: Hussmann, H. (ed.) FASE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2029, p. 171. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Astesiano, E., Reggio, G. (2010). Revising the UML Collaborations: A Well-Founded Approach. In: Choppy, C., Sokolsky, O. (eds) Foundations of Computer Software. Future Trends and Techniques for Development. Monterey Workshop 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6028. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12566-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12566-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12565-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12566-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics