Skip to main content

Legal Language and Legal Knowledge Management Applications

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6036))

Abstract

This work is an investigation into the peculiarities of legal language with respect to ordinary language. Based on the idea that a shallow parsing approach can help to provide enough detailed linguistic information, this work presents the results obtained by shallow parsing (i.e. chunking) corpora of Italian and English legal texts and comparing them with corpora of ordinary language. In particular, this paper puts the emphasis of how understanding the syntactic and lexical characteristics of this specialised language has practical importance in the development of domain–specific Knowledge Management applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abney, S.P.: Parsing by chunks. In: Berwick, R.C., et al. (eds.) Principled–Based Parsing: Computation and Psycholinguistics, pp. 257–278. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agnoloni, T., Bacci, L., Francesconi, E., Peters, W., Montemagni, S., Venturi, G.: A two–level knowledge approach to support multilingual legislative drafting. In: Breuker, J., Casanovas, P., Francesconi, E., Klein, M. (eds.) Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ananiadou, S., McNaught, J. (eds.): Text Mining for Biology and Biomedicine. Artech House, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bartolini, R., Lenci, A., Montemagni, S., Pirrelli, V.: Hybrid Constraints for Robust Parsing: First Experiments and Evaluation. In: Proceedings of LREC 2004, Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Centro Cultural de Belem, Lisbon, Portugal, May 26-28, pp. 795–798 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bartolini, R., Lenci, A., Montemagni, S., Pirrelli, V., Soria, C.: Automatic classification and analysis of provisions in legal texts: a case study. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Corsaro, A. (eds.) OTM-WS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3292, pp. 593–604. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brighi, R., Lesmo, L., Mazzei, A., Palmirani, M., Radicioni, D.P.: Towards Semantic Interpretation of Legal Modifications through Deep Syntactic Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 21th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2008), Florence, December 10-13 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Federici, S., Montemagni, S., Pirrelli, V.: Shallow Parsing and Text Chunking: a View on Underspecification in Syntax. In: Carroll, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Robust Parsing, ESSLLI, Prague, August 12-16 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fiorentino, G.: Web usability e semplificazione linguistica. In: Venier, F. (ed.) Rete Pubblica. Il dialogo tra Pubblica Amministrazione e cittadino: linguaggi e architettura dellinformazione, Perugia, Edizione Guerra, pp. 11–38 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grover, C., Hachey, B., Hughson, I., Korycinski, C.: Automatic Summarisation of Legal Documents. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2003), Scotland, United Kingdom, pp. 243–251 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gurevich, O., Crouch, R.: Deverbal Nouns in Knowledge Representation. Journal of Logic and Computation 18(3), 385–404 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Lame, G.: Using NLP techniques to identify legal ontology components: concepts and relations. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 169–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lease, M., Charniak, E.: Parsing Biomedical Literature. In: Dale, R., Wong, K.-F., Su, J., Kwong, O.Y. (eds.) IJCNLP 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3651, pp. 58–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Lenci, A., Montemagni, S., Pirrelli, V.: CHUNK–IT. An Italian Shallow Parser for Robust Syntactic Annotation. In: Linguistica Computazionale, Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali, Pisa–Roma (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, X., Roth, D.: Exploring Evidence for Shallow Parsing. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Toulouse, France (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marinelli, R., Biagini, L., Bindi, R., Goggi, S., Monachini, M., Orsolini, P., Picchi, E., Rossi, S., Calzolari, N., Zampolli, A.: The Italian PAROLE corpus: an overview. In: Zampolli, A., Calzolari, N., Cignoni, L. (eds.) Computational Linguistics in Pisa - Linguistica Computazionale a Pisa. Linguistica Computazionale, Special Issue, XVI-XVII, Pisa–Roma, IEPI. Tomo I, pp. 401–421 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McCarty, L.T.: Deep Semantic Interpretations of Legal Texts. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL), June 4-8. Stanford Law School, Stanford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCarty, T.: Remarks on Legal Text Processing – Parsing, Semantics and Information Extraction. In: Proceedings of the Worskhop on Natural Language Engineering of Legal Argumentation, Barcelona, Spain, June 11 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mochales Palau, R., Moens, M.-F.: Argumentation Mining: the Detection, Classification and Structure of Arguments in Text. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law (ICAIL), June 8-12. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moens, M.-F., Mochales Palau, R., Boiy, E., Reed, C.: Automatic detection of Arguments in Legal Texts. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and law (ICAIL), June 4-8. Stanford Law School, Stanford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mortara Garavelli, B.: Le parole e la giustizia. In: Divagazioni grammaticali e retoriche su testi giuridici italiani, Torino, Einaudi (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nakamura, M., Nobuoka, S., Shimazu, A.: Towards Translation of Legal Sentences into Logical Forms. In: Satoh, K., Inokuchi, A., Nagao, K., Kawamura, T. (eds.) JSAI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4914, pp. 349–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Pado, S., Pennacchiotti, M., Sporleder, C.: Semantic role assignment for event nominalisations by leveraging verbal data. In: Proceedings of Coling 2008, Manchester, UK, August 18-22 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pala, K., Rychlý, P., S̆merk, P.: Automatic Identification of Legal Terms in Czech Legal Texts. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6036, pp. 83–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pala, K., Rychlý, P., S̆merk, P.: Morphological Analysis of Law texts. In: Sojka, P.H., Ales̆-Sojka, P. (eds.) First Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Languages Processing (RASLAN 2007), pp. 21–26. Masaryk University, Brno (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pyysalo, S., Salakoski, T., Aubin, S., Nazarenko, A.: Lexical adaptation of link grammar to the biomedical sublanguage: a comparative evaluation of three approaches. BMC Bioinformatics 7(Suppl. 3), S2 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rissland, E.L.: Ai and legal reasoning. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference in Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 1985 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sagae, K., Tsujii, J.: Dependency parsing and domain adaptation with LR models and parser ensembles. In: Proceedings of EMNLP–CoNLL 2007, pp. 1044–1050 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Saias, J., Quaresma, P.: A Methodology to Create Legal Ontologies in a Logic Programming Based Web Information Retrieval System. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 185–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Spinosa, P., Giardiello, G., Cherubini, M., Marchi, S., Venturi, G., Montemagni, S.: NLP–based Metadata Extraction for Legal Text Consolidation. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2009), Barcelona, Spain, June 8-12 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tsuruoka, Y., Tateishi, Y., Kim, J.-D., Ohta, T., McNaught, J., Ananiadou, S., Tsujii, J.: Developing a Robust Part–of–Speech Tagger for Biomedical Text. In: Bozanis, P., Houstis, E.N. (eds.) PCI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3746, pp. 382–392. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Völker, J., Langa, S.F., Sure, Y.: Supporting the Construction of Spanish Legal Ontologies with Text2Onto. In: Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Casellas, N., Rubino, R. (eds.) Computable Models of the Law. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4884, pp. 105–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Gog, R., Van Engers, T.M.: Modelling Legislation Using Natural Language Processing. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Venturi, G.: Linguistic analysis of a corpus of Italian legal texts. A NLP–based approach. In: Karasimos, et al. (eds.) Proceedings of First Patras International Conference of Graduate Students in Linguistics (PICGL 2008), pp. 139–149. University of Patras Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Walter, S., Pinkal, M.: Automatic extraction of definitions from german court decisions. In: Proceedings of the COLING 2006 Workshop on Information Extraction Beyond The Document, Sydney, July 2006, pp. 20–28 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Walter, S.: Linguistic Description and Automatic Extraction of Definitions from German Court Decisions. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008), Marrakech, Morocco, May 28-30 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wyner, A., Mochales-Palau, R., Moens, M.F., Milward, D.: Approaches to Text Mining Arguments from Legal Cases. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6036, pp. 60–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wyner, A., van Engers, T.: From Argument in Natural Language to Formalised Argumentation: Components, Prospects and Problems. In: Proceedings of the Worskhop on Natural Language Engineering of Legal Argumentation, Barcelona, Spain, June 11 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Venturi, G. (2010). Legal Language and Legal Knowledge Management Applications. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6036. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12836-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12837-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics