Skip to main content

A Modular Voting Architecture (“Frog Voting”)

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 6000))

Abstract

This paper presents a new framework–a reference architecture–for voting that we feel has many attractive features. It is not a machine design, but rather a framework that will stimulate innovation and design. It is potentially the standard architecture for all future voting equipment. The ideas expressed here are subject to improvement and further research.

An early version of this paper appeared in [2]. This version of the paper is very similar, but contains a postscript (Section 8) providing commentary and discussion of perspectives on this proposal generated during the intervening years between 2001 and 2008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. OASIS. Election markup language (EML) v5.0 (2007), http://www.oasis-open.org/specs/index.php#eml5.0

  2. CalTech/MIT Voting Technology Project. Voting: What is, what could be. Technical report (July 2001), http://www.vote.caltech.edu/2001report.htm

  3. Rivest, R.L., Wack, J.P.: On the notion of “software independence” in voting systems, July 28 (2006), http://vote.nist.gov/SI-in-voting.pdf

  4. TDC. Voluntary voting system guidelines, http://www.eac.gov/vvsg

  5. Yee, K.-P.: Building Reliable Voting Machine Software. PhD thesis, U.C. Berkeley EECS Dept. (2007); Technical Report 2007-167, http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2007/EECS-2007-167.html

  6. Yee, K.-P., Wagner, D., Hearst, M., Bellovin, S.: Prerendered user interfaces for high-assurance electronic voting. In: USENIX/ACCURATE Electronic Voting Technology Workshop (2006), http://zesty.ca/pubs/yee-wagner-hearst-bellovin-prui-usenix2006.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bruck, S., Jefferson, D., Rivest, R.L. (2010). A Modular Voting Architecture (“Frog Voting”). In: Chaum, D., et al. Towards Trustworthy Elections. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6000. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12980-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12980-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12979-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12980-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics