Skip to main content

Predicting Optimal Constraint Satisfaction Methods

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6085))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2555 Accesses

Abstract

Given the breadth of constraint satisfaction problems (CSP) and the wide variety of CSP solvers, it is often very difficult to determine a priori which solving method is best suited to a problem. This work explores the use of machine learning to predict which solving method will be most effective for a given problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dechter, R., Meiri, I.: Experimental evaluation of preprocessing techniques in constraint satisfaction problems. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 271–277 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elkan, C.: The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 17, pp. 973–978 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein, S., Wallace, R., Freuder, E., Li, X.: Learning Propagation Policies. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Constraint Propagation And Implementation, pp. 1–15 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frost, D., Dechter, R.: Look-ahead value ordering for constraint satisfaction problems. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 14, pp. 572–578 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gent, I., MacIntyre, E., Prosser, P., Walsh, T.: The constrainedness of search. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 246–252 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haralick, R., Elliott, G.: Increasing tree search efficiency for constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial intelligence 14(3), 263–313 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Petrovic, S., Epstein, S.: Random Subsets Support Learning a Mixture of Heuristics. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 17(3), 501–520 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Quinlan, J.: C4. 5: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xu, L., Hutter, F., Hoos, H., Leyton-Brown, K.: SATzilla: portfolio-based algorithm selection for SAT. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 32(1), 565–606 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Thompson, C.D.S. (2010). Predicting Optimal Constraint Satisfaction Methods. In: Farzindar, A., Kešelj, V. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6085. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13059-5_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13059-5_56

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13058-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13059-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics