Skip to main content

Using TOPSIS Approach for Solving the Problem of Optimal Competence Set Adjustment with Multiple Target Solutions

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Neural Networks - ISNN 2010 (ISNN 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6064))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1714 Accesses

Abstract

Management by objectives (MBO) is an effective framework for enterprise management. In the optimal adjustment of competence set problem, the relevant coefficients are adjusted so that a given target solution (objective) could be attainable. However, various target solutions might be given from various points of view. The conventional method is concerned only with one target solution rather than multiple targets. In this paper, we employ the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method to select/evaluate target solutions suggested by decision maker. A numerical example with four target solutions is also used to illustrate the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Yu, P.L.: Forming winning strategies - An integrated theory of Habitual Domains. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu, P.L.: Habitual Domains. Oper. Res. 39(6), 869–876 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu, P.L.: Habitual Domains and forming winning strategies. NCTU Press, Taiwan (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yu, P.L., Zhang, D.: A foundation for competence set analysis. Math. Soc. Sci. 20(3), 251–299 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu, P.L., Zhang, D.: Optimal expansion of competence set and decision support. Oper. Res. 30(1), 68–84 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, H.L., Yu, P.L.: Optimal Competence Set Expansion Using Deduction Graphs. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 80(1), 75–91 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi, D.S., Yu, P.L.: Optimal Expansion and Design of Competence Sets with Asymmetric Acquiring Costs. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 88(3), 643–658 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Feng, J.W., Yu, P.L.: Minimum Spanning Table and Optimal Expansion of Competence Set. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 99(3), 655–679 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, J.J., Tzeng, G.H., Ong, C.S.: Optimal fuzzy multi-criteria expansion of competence sets using multi-objectives evolutionary algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 30(4), 739–745 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, T.Y.: Using Competence Sets to Analyze the Consumer Decision Problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 128(1), 98–118 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, T.Y.: Expanding competence sets for the consumer decision problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 138(3), 622–648 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lai, T.C., Chianglin, C.Y., Yu, P.L.: Optimal adjustment of competence set with linear programming. Taiwan. J. Math. 12(8), 2045–2062 (2008)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hwang, C., Yoon, K.: Multiple attribute decision making methods and application. Springer, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Deng, H., Yeh, C.H., Willis, R.J.: Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput. Oper. Res. 27(10), 963–973 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Janic, M.: Multicriteria Evaluation of High-speed Rail, Transrapid Maglev and Air Passenger Transport in Europe. Transp. Plan. Technol. 26(6), 491–512 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, M.C., Wang, C.C., Chen, M.S., Chang, C.A.: Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process. Comput. Ind. 59(1), 17–31 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shih, H.S., Shyur, H.J., Lee, E.S.: An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Math. Comput. Model. 45(7-8), 801–813 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zanakis, S.H., Solomon, A., Wishart, N., Dublish, S.: Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 107, 507–529 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeleny, M.: Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw-Hill, New York (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Berberian, S.K.: Fundamentals of Real Analysis. Springer, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steuer, R.E.: Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application. John Wiley, New York (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lai, TC. (2010). Using TOPSIS Approach for Solving the Problem of Optimal Competence Set Adjustment with Multiple Target Solutions. In: Zhang, L., Lu, BL., Kwok, J. (eds) Advances in Neural Networks - ISNN 2010. ISNN 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6064. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13318-3_75

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13318-3_75

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13317-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13318-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics