Skip to main content

Hints: Is It Better to Give or Wait to Be Asked?

  • Conference paper
Book cover Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6094))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Many tutoring systems allow students to ask for hints when they need help solving problems, and this has been shown to be helpful. However, many students have trouble knowing when to ask for help or they prefer to guess rather than ask for and read a hint. Is it better to give a hint when a student makes an error or wait until the student asks for a hint? This paper describes a study that compares giving hints proactively when students make errors to requiring students to ask for a hint when they want one. We found that students learned reliably more with hints-on-demand than proactive hints. This effect was especially evident for students who tend to ask for a high number of hints. There was not a significant difference between the two conditions for students who did not ask for many hints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.R.: Rules of the Mind. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burton, R.R., Brown, J.S.: An Investigation of Computer Coaching for Informal Learning Activities. In: Sleeman, D.H., Brown, J.S. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Academic Press, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kay, J.: Learner Control. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11, 111–127 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Beck, J.: Does Learner Control Affect Learning? In: 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 135–142 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wood, D.: Scaffolding, contingent tutoring, and computer-supported learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12, 280–292 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Renkl, A.: Learning from worked-out examples: Instructional explanations supplement self-explanations. Learning & Instruction 12, 529–556 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schworm, S., Renkl, A.: Learning by solved example problems: Instructional explanations reduce self-explanation activity. In: Gray, W.D., Schunn, C.D. (eds.) 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 816–821. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arroyo, I., Murrary, T., Woolf, B.P.: Inferring Unobservable Learning Variables From Students’ Help Seeking Behavior. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 782–784. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nelson-Le Gall, S.: Help-seeking: An understudied problem-solving skill in children. Developmental Review 1, 224–246 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baker, R., Walonoski, J., Heffernan, N., Roll, I., Corbett, A., Koedinger, K.: Why Students Engage in “Gaming the System” Behavior in Interactive Learning Environments. J. Interactive Learning Research 19(2), 185–224 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.: Limitations of student control: Do students know when they need help? In: Gauthier, G., VanLehn, K., Frasson, C. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 292–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Aleven, V., McLaren, B., Roll, I., Koedinger, K.: Toward tutoring help seeking: Applying cognitive modeling to meta-cognitive skills. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 227–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arroyo, I., Beck, J.E., Beal, C.R., Wing, R., Woolf, B.P.: Analyzing students’ response to help provision in an elementary mathematics intelligent tutoring system. In: Luckin, R. (ed.) Papers of the AIED 2001 Workshop on Help Provision and Help Seeking in Interactive Learning Environments, San Antonio, Texas, pp. 34–46 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murray, C., VanLehn, K.: A Comparison of Decision-Theoretic, Fixed-Policy and Random Tutorial Action Selection. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 114–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Razzaq, L., Heffernan, N.T., Koedinger, K.R., Feng, M., et al.: Blending Assessment and Instructional Assistance. In: Nedjah, N., de Macedo, M.L., Borges, M.N., Almeida, N.N. (eds.) Intelligent Educational Machines within the Intelligent Systems Engineering Book Series, pp. 23–49 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Razzaq, L., Heffernan, N.T. (2010). Hints: Is It Better to Give or Wait to Be Asked?. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6094. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13387-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13388-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics