Skip to main content

How Adaptive Is an Expert Human Tutor?

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6094))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In examine the tutoring protocols of one expert human tutor tutoring 10 students in solving physics problems, four analyses reveal that he tutored the five good learners in different ways than the five poorer learners, resulting also in greater adjusted gains for the good learners. This opens up the question of whether the tutor is non-optimally adaptive. We introduce a new conceptual framework and a new perspective in our coding analyses in order to examine how adaptive an expert tutor is.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chi, M.T.H., Roy, M., Hausmann, R.G.: Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive Science 32(2), 301–341 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shute, V.J.: A macroadaptive approach to tutoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 4(1), 61–93 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Murray, R.C., VanLehn, K., Mostow, J.: Looking ahead to select tutorial actions: A decision-theoretic approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 14(3/4), 235–278 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wood, D.J., Wood, H., Middleton, D.: An experimental evaluation of four face-to-face teaching strategies. International Journal of Behavioral Development 1, 131–147 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chi, M.T.H.: Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science 1, 73–105 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayer, R.: Learning and Instruction, p. 17. Pearson Education, Inc., New Jersey (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prince, M.: Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education 93(3), 223–231 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Chi, M.T.H., Siler, S., Jeong, Y.H., Yamauchi, T., Hausmann, R.: Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science 25, 363–387 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Connor, M., Michaels, S.: Shifting participant framework: orchestration thinking practices in group discussion. In: Hicks, D. (ed.) Discourse, learning, and schooliing, pp. 63–103. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chi, M.T.H., Roy, M. (2010). How Adaptive Is an Expert Human Tutor?. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6094. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13387-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13388-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics