Skip to main content

Computational Workflows for Assessing Student Learning

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6095))

Abstract

The use of technology for instruction, and the enormous amount of information available for consumption, places a considerable burden on instructors who must learn to integrate appropriate student practices and learning assessment. The Pedagogical Workflows project is developing a novel workflow environment that supports efficient assessment of student learning through interactive generation and execution of various assessment workflows. We focus especially on how student discussion use can be combined with more traditional assessment data. In this paper, we present our initial assessment workflows, the initial feedback from instructors, and the user portal that is being developed for running the workflows. Inherent in the development of the workflows is an examination of what teachers think is important to learn about their students, a question that is central to every intelligent tutoring system. We anticipate that assessment workflows will become an important tool for instructors, researchers, and ITS development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Deelman, E., Singh, G., Su, M., Blythe, J., Gil, Y., Kesselman, C., Mehta, G., Vahi, K., Berriman, G.B., Good, J., Laity, A., Jacob, J.C., Katz, D.S.: Pegasus: a Framework for Mapping Complex Scientific Workflows onto Distributed Systems. Scientific Programming Journal 13(3) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gil, Y., Ratnakar, V., Kim, J., Gonzales-Calero, P., Groth, P., Moody, J., Deelman, E.: WINGS: Intelligent Workflow-Based Design of Computational Experiments. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, J., Shaw, E.: Pedagogical Discourse: Connecting Students to Past Discussions and Peer Mentors within an Online Discussion Board. In: The 21st Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ravi, S., Kim, J.: Profiling Student Interactions in Threaded Discussions with Speech Act Classifiers. In: Proceedings of the AI in Education Conference (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reed-Rhoads: C16 – Tools for Assessing Learning in Engineering. Presentation on Inventions and Impact 2: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, J., Deelman, E., Gil, Y., Mehta, G., Ratnakar, V.: Provenance Trails in the Wings/Pegasus Workflow System. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, Special Issue on the First Provenance Challenge 20(5) (April 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Suthers, D., Hundhausen, C.: The effects of representations on students’ elaborations in collaborative inquiry. In: Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, pp. 280–472. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stahl, G.: The Complexity of a Collaborative Interaction. In: Proc. of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, J., Gil, Y., Spraragen, M.: Principles for Interactive Acquisition and Validation of Workflows. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, J., Spraragen, M., Gil, Y.: An Intelligent Assistant for Interactive Workflow Composition. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. OWL 2010 (2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/

  12. Jena 2010 (2010), http://jena.sourceforge.net/

  13. Della-Piana, C., Pimmel, R., Watford, B.: Project Evaluation. In: Workshop for Faculty from Minority Serving Institutions, Feburary 8 -10 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McLaren, B.M., Scheuer, O., De Laat, M., Hever, R., De Groot, R., Rose, C.P.: Using Machine Learning Techniques to Analyze and Support Mediation of Student E-Discussions. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Graesser, A.C., Olney, A., Ventura, M., Jackson, G.T.: AutoTutor’s Coverage of Expectations during Tutorial Dialogue. In: Proceedings of the FLAIRS Conference 2005, pp. 518–523 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ma, J., Shaw, E., Kim, J. (2010). Computational Workflows for Assessing Student Learning. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6095. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13436-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13437-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics