Skip to main content

Improving Multi-agent Negotiations Using Multi-Objective PSO Algorithm

  • Conference paper
Book cover Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications (KES-AMSTA 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6070))

Abstract

Negotiation over limited resources, as a way for the agents to reach agreement, is one of the significant topics in Multi-Agent Systems (MASs). Most of the models proposed for negotiation suffer from different limitations in the number of the negotiation parties and issues as well as some constraining assumptions such as availability of unlimited computational resources and complete information about the participants. In this paper we make an attempt to ease the limitations specified above by means of a distributive agent based mechanism underpinned by Multi-Objective Swarm Optimization (MOPSO), as a fast and effective learning technique to handle the complexity and dynamics of the real-world negotiations. The experimental results of the proposed method reveal its effectiveness and high performance in presence of limited computational resources and tough deadlines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sycara, K.: Multi-agent compromise via negotiation. In: Gasser, L., Huhns, M. (eds.) Distributed Artificial Intelligence II, pp. 119–139. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rubenstein-Montano, B., Malaga, R.A.: A Weighted Sum Genetic Algorithm to Support Multiple-Party Multi-Objective Negotiations. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(4), 366–377 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kraus, S.: Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments. Artificial Intelligence 94(1-2), 79–97 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Pruitt, D.: Negotiation Behaviour. Academic Press, London (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rubinstein: Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1), 97–109 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: The Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fatima, S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Comparing Equilibria for Game-Theoretic and Evolutionary Bargaining Models. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce V, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 70–77 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. He, M., Jennings, N.R., Leung, H.: On agent-mediated electronic commerce. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(4), 985–1003 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harsanyi, J., Selten, R.: A generalised nash solution for two-person bargaining games with incomplete information. Management Sciences 18(5), 80–106 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Krovi, R., Graesser, A., Pracht, W.: Agent behaviors in virtual negotiation environments. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 29(1), 15–25 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matwin, S., Szapiro, T., Haigh, K.: Genetic algorithm approach to a negotiation support system. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics 21(1), 102–114 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.C.: Particle Swarm Optimization. In: Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Neural Networks, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 1942–1948 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alvarez-Benitez, J.E., Everson, R.M., Fieldsend, J.E.: A MOPSO algorithm based exclusively on Pareto dominance concepts. In: Coello Coello, C.A., Hernández Aguirre, A., Zitzler, E. (eds.) EMO 2005. LNCS, vol. 3410, pp. 459–473. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenschein, J., Zlotkin, G.: Task oriented domains. In: Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers, pp. 29–52. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barbuceanu, M., Lo, W.K.: Multi-attribute utility theoretic negotiation for electronic commerce. In: Dignum, F., Cortés, U. (eds.) AMEC 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2003, pp. 15–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence 142(2), 205–237 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Raiffa, H.: The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Esmaeili, A., Mozayani, N. (2010). Improving Multi-agent Negotiations Using Multi-Objective PSO Algorithm. In: Jędrzejowicz, P., Nguyen, N.T., Howlet, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications. KES-AMSTA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6070. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13480-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13480-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13479-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13480-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics