Skip to main content

Categories of Direlations and Rough Set Approximation Operators

  • Conference paper
Book cover Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (RSCTC 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6086))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1494 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we define a category R-APR whose objects are sets and morphisms are the pairs of rough set approximation operators. We show that R-APR is isomorphic to a full subcategory of the category cdrTex whose objects are complemented textures and morphisms are complemented direlations. Therefore, cdrTex may be regarded as an abstract model for the study of rough set theory. On the other hand, dagger symmetric monoidal categories play a central role in the abstract quantum mechanics. Here, we show that R-APR and cdrTex are also dagger symmetric monoidal categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramsky, S., Coecke, B.: A categorical semantics of quantum protocols. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS, pp. 415–425. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee, M., Chakraborty, M.K.: A category for rough sets. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 18(3-4), 167–188 (1983)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Banerjee, M., Yao, Y.: A categorial basis for granular computing. In: An, A., Stefanowski, J., Ramanna, S., Butz, C.J., Pedrycz, W., Wang, G. (eds.) RSFDGrC 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4482, pp. 427–434. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, L.M., Irkad, A.: Binary di-operations and spaces of real difunctions on a texture. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 37(1), 25–39 (2008)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, L.M., Diker, M.: Ditopological texture spaces and intuitionistic sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems (98), 217–224 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, L.M., Ertürk, R., Dost, Ş.: Ditopological texture spaces and fuzzy topology, I. Basic Concepts. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 147, 171–199 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Daowu, P., Xu, Z.: Rough set models on two universes. International Journal of General Systems 33(5), 569–581 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Diker, M.: Textural approach to rough sets based on relations. Information Sciences 180(8), 1418–1433 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Eklund, P., Galán, M.Á.: Monads can be rough. In: Greco, S., Hata, Y., Hirano, S., Inuiguchi, M., Miyamoto, S., Nguyen, H.S., Słowiński, R. (eds.) RSCTC 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4259, pp. 77–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Eklund, P., Galán, M.A.: The rough powerset monad. J. Mult.-Valued Logic Soft Comput. 13(4-6), 321–333 (2007)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Eklund, P., Galán, M.A., Gähler, W.: Partially Ordered Monads for Monadic Topologies, Rough Sets and Kleene Algebras. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 225, 67–81 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iwinski, T.B.: Algebraic approach to rough sets. Bull. Pol. Ac. Math. 35(6), 673–683 (1987)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, X., Yuan, X.: The category RSC of I-rough sets. In: 2008 Fifth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, FSKD, vol. 1, pp. 448–452 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mac Lane, S.: Categories for the working matematician. Springer Graduate Text in Mathematics 5 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Selinger, P.: Dagger compact closed categories and completely positive maps. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 170, 139–163 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Yao, Y.: Constructive and algebraic methods of the theory of rough sets. Information Sciences 109, 21–47 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Diker, M. (2010). Categories of Direlations and Rough Set Approximation Operators. In: Szczuka, M., Kryszkiewicz, M., Ramanna, S., Jensen, R., Hu, Q. (eds) Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. RSCTC 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6086. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13529-3_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13529-3_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13528-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13529-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics