Skip to main content

Analysing Bidder Performance in Randomised and Fixed-Deadline Automated Auctions

  • Conference paper
Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications (KES-AMSTA 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6071))

Abstract

The rule with which automated computerised auctions are closed play an important role in determining bidder strategies and auction outcomes. In this paper we examine two such rules: auctions with randomised closing times and fixed deadlines. To this end, stochastic models of auctions with discrete state-space representing the prices attained are developed and analysed. The models allow us to determine the stationary probabilistic outcomes of the auctions, which are used to examine the bidder performance, measured as the savings it makes with respect to the maximum payable or its payoff. For this purpose, one bidder is singled out as the “special bidder” (SB) and its performance is studied as a function of the speed with which it raises the price, or its bid rate. The results show that with random closures, the SB has incentives to place bids promptly to obtain high savings; on the other hand, with fixed deadline auctions, the SB should choose its bid rate with respect to the other system parameters in order to maximise payoffs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Roth, A., Ockenfels, A.: Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet. Amer. Econ. Rev. 92(4), 1093–1103 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ariely, D., Ockenfels, A., Roth, A.: An experimental analysis of ending rules in Internet auctions. RAND Journal of Economics 36(4), 890–907 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ockenfels, A., Roth, A.E.: Late and multiple bidding in second price Internet auctions: Theory and evidence concerning different rules for ending an auction. Games Econ. Behav. 55(2), 297–320 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. LSE: London Stock Exchange: Market Enhancements, http://www.londonstockexchange.com/information-providers/technical-library/technical-guidance-notes/technicalguidancenotesarchive/release.pdf (accessed on January 28, 2010)

  5. Velan, K.: Modelling Bidders in Sequential Automated Auctions. The Computer Journal 53(2), 208–218 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gelenbe, E., Velan, K.: An Approximate Model for Bidders in Sequential Automated Auctions. In: Håkansson, A., Nguyen, N.T., Hartung, R.L., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES-AMSTA 2009. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 5559, pp. 70–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Gelenbe, E.: Analysis of Automated Auctions. In: Levi, A., Savaş, E., Yenigün, H., Balcısoy, S., Saygın, Y. (eds.) ISCIS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4263, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gelenbe, E.: Analysis of Single and Networked Auctions. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 9(2), 1–24 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Medhi, J.: Stochastic Processes, 2nd edn. Wiley Eastern Ltd., Chichester (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gelenbe, E., Györfi, L.: Performance of Auctions and Sealed Bids. In: Bradley, J.T. (ed.) EPEW 2009. LNCS, vol. 5652, pp. 30–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Onur, I., Tomak, K.: Impact of ending rules in online auctions: The case of Yahoo.com. Decision Support Systems 42(3), 1835–1842 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rothkopf, M.H., Harstad, R.M.: Modeling Competitive Bidding: A Critical Essay. Manage. Sci. 40(3), 364–384 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rothkopf, M.H.: Decision Analysis: The Right Tool for Auctions. Decision Analysis 4(3), 167–172 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Velan, K., Gelenbe, E. (2010). Analysing Bidder Performance in Randomised and Fixed-Deadline Automated Auctions. In: Jędrzejowicz, P., Nguyen, N.T., Howlet, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications. KES-AMSTA 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6071. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13541-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13541-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13540-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13541-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics